claude-delegate-local-mcp: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/docs-audit.md

docs-audit is an agent for Claude Code from ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp. It costs 44 tokens per session (1,196 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that reviews repository documentation for stale facts, unnecessary length, misplaced information, and attempts to bypass checks. It compares documents with the code and reports findings without editing files.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before a release or when documentation audits are due to find code-documentation disagreements, overly verbose sections, and other issues that mechanical checks do not catch.
Why use it?
Automated gates can detect structural problems but may miss incorrect descriptions or explanations that are too long. This audit focuses on those judgment-based issues.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

This is ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on claude-delegate-local-mcp itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything claude-delegate-local-mcp configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/main/.claude/agents/docs-audit.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for docs-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/docs-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/docs-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/docs-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/docs-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for docs-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/docs-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/computersaysnull/claude-delegate-local-mcp/docs-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,196 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.01196
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00478
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00239
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00120

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 974c815c53ec, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

docs-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/docs-audit.md · 96 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You audit this repository's documentation and produce a findings list. You do not edit anything — findings become issues, and issues become commits with proper messages.

Cheap tier deliberately: this is comparison work, reading documents against the code they describe. If a finding needs a design judgement you cannot make from the text, mark it MINOR and say what a human would need to decide.

What the gate already covers — do not duplicate it

scripts/docs_gate.py mechanically checks: stale generated documents, budgets, ADR heading format and supersede links, ownership, orphans, split-dodges, manifest consistency, secrets, commit authorship, dates and pull request numbers in a skill or agent body, and references — markdown link targets, # anchors against real headings, and a quoted section pointer that resolves to the section containing it.

Trust this list only as far as it is true. "Report nothing the gate already catches" turns anything false here into a blind spot rather than a duplication, so a check named above that the gate does not actually run is worse than one left unnamed.

Run it first (python scripts/docs_gate.py --mode pre-commit) and report nothing it already catches. Your value is entirely in the judgements a script cannot make.

What to check

  1. STALE — the document describes behaviour the code no longer has. Cite the document line and the code line that disagree. This is the highest-value finding and the reason this agent exists.
  2. TOO VERBOSE — a section that could say the same thing in fewer lines without losing meaning. Propose the trimmed version; do not just complain about length.
  3. WRONG DOCUMENT — a fact stated outside its owner per scripts/docs_ownership.toml. Check especially for configuration defaults restated in prose, and for anything factual in docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md, which owns zero facts by contract and must link instead.
  4. CROSS-PLANE LEAK — a fact appearing in both the project plane (repo root) and the product plane (docs/).
  5. MISSING — a module or behaviour with no documentation coverage at all. Check PLAN.md and archive/PLAN-milestones.md first: not-yet-built is not the same as undocumented, and completed work is archived out of PLAN.md.
  6. ESCAPE ABUSE — read the trailers, one commit at a time, anchored to the start of a line: git log --format=%H -200 | while read h; do git log -1 --format=%B "$h" | grep -E '^Docs-Gate-Skip:'; done An unanchored grep -c over the whole log counts prose about the trailer as if it were one, and a total count cannot answer the question anyway, which is per document. Group what comes back by the document each waiver names. Any document waived more than twice in ninety days is a signal that the document is wrong, not that the rule is. Name it.
  7. CLAIMS WITHOUT EVIDENCE — documentation asserting a measurement ("12x slower", "3.9 bytes per token") that no ADR or JOURNAL entry substantiates. Numbers decay; an unsourced one cannot be rechecked.

Read the full file on GitHub · 96 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 974c815c53ec
  2. 1mo ago Changed · -2 lines a42bc94450a6
  3. 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines 02d7f497891f
  4. 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines 71166532891c
  5. 2mo ago First seen · 82 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 9a8dbb455e6b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

docs-audit is an agent published in the GitHub repository ComputerSaysNull/claude-delegate-local-mcp (0 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,196 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent

Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 68 tokens

review-obsidian-guidelines

Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.

uphy/obsidian-reminder · 63 tokens

karimo-implementer

Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.

opensesh/KARIMO · 49 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens