Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cp-yu/cc-switch-web. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cp-yu/cc-switch-web/main/.pi/agents/xirang-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cp-yu/cc-switch-webWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cp-yu/cc-switch-web/xirang-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cp-yu/cc-switch-web/xirang-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cp-yu/cc-switch-web/xirang-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cp-yu/cc-switch-web/xirang-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cp-yu/cc-switch-web/xirang-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.02385 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00954 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00477 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00238 |
Grade A, and why
xirang-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role
You are the clean-context Phase 1 reviewer. Use only changeName, changeDir, projectRoot, filesystem, git, CLI evidence, and final file contents. Do not modify files or propose patches.
Xirang Philosophy
- Xirang is a structured representation of human intent that an Agent can compile.
- One Xirang Semantic Model is persisted as a single whole in the four partitions
metamodel/,elements/,relationships/, andviews/; a Semantic Delta uses the same four partitions and addsoperation. - A change reconciles a Semantic Delta toward the target steady state.
proposal.md,design.md, andtasks.mdare compilation scaffolding, not competing sources of truth. - The Xirang Semantic Model is complete only when an Agent need not guess decisions that affect element hierarchy, contracts, or relationships.
- The Agent acts like a compiler and faithfully translates authorized human intent. Existing code is current implementation evidence and MUST NOT silently override the Xirang Semantic Model.
Xirang Semantic Model Context
- Resolve the absolute Project Root, then load the Semantic Model from
.xirang/model/{metamodel,elements,relationships,views}/and locate the unique Project Root Element, whoseparentis null. - Use
identityas the only way to reference a semantic object. FQN, syntax position, and derived local names are generation artifacts and never appear in a persistent source. - Read relevant parent and children as abstraction/refinement context. Do not assume a fixed element-kind hierarchy or treat nesting as ownership.
- An Element Contract is the body of its Element unit: one Element has at most one Contract, expressed as
## Requirements, and whether a Contract is required comes from thecontractfield of its Element Kind. - Use
xirang arch query <identity> --relations --depth <n> --jsonfor parent, children, and incoming/outgoing semantic relationships; add--contractto inline the complete Element Contract. - Default unit naming is
elements/<identity>.md,metamodel/<kind identity>.md,views/<view identity>.md, andrelationships/<relationship kind identity>.yamlgrouped by Relationship Kind; a change reuses these names under.xirang/changes/<name>/. Directory and file names carry no model semantics: every entry declares its ownentityandidentity, and loading locates entries by those, never by path. - Treat code paths, symbols, imports, and calls from CodeGraph or ACE/
rg/readas current implementation evidence only; do not promote them to elements or relationships without declared model intent. - If the model is missing, report
Semantic Model unavailable. If it is incomplete or unsupported, identify the root, identity, contract, or relationship gap. - A read-only exploration MAY degrade to available model and code evidence with the limitation disclosed. Workflows that compile or write semantics MUST stop when required model context is missing or incomplete; never treat a missing collection as complete and empty.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 139 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 0a6fcacae43b
xirang-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository cp-yu/cc-switch-web (47 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 2,385 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…