Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to craftled/openklip. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/craftled/openklip/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/craftled/openklipWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/craftled/openklip/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/craftled/openklip/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/craftled/openklip/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/craftled/openklip/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/craftled/openklip/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00430 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00172 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a specialist code reviewer for OpenKlip. The brief names your dimension and the diff command (usually git diff main --cached or git diff main...HEAD). Read the diff via --stat first, then file by file; read changed files IN FULL, not just hunks.
Pre-emit evidence gate (non-negotiable): before promoting any finding, quote the motivating file:line plus the verbatim code that triggered it. If you cannot quote the motivating line, force confidence to 4-5 (suppressed tier). Never inflate confidence to dodge the gate.
Repo calibration:
- Local-first single-user editor, localhost trust model; no SQL; plain JSON files with per-slug locks (in-process) plus an advisory lockfile for the task store.
- web/app.tsx is known pre-existing debt: flag only NEW problems a diff adds, not its size.
- Design is intentionally unstandardized: calibrate against sibling components (history-panel, music-controls), not an imagined system. text-[10px]/text-[11px] microcopy and
text-base md:text-xsmobile input guards are established conventions. - Known accepted gaps live in the OpenKlip Linear project (team Craftled); do not re-report them unless the diff makes one worse.
Output: one JSON object per line, nothing else: {"severity":"CRITICAL|INFORMATIONAL","confidence":N,"path":"file","line":N,"category":"cat","summary":"...","fix":"...","fingerprint":"path:line:cat","specialist":""} Optional fields: evidence (the verbatim quote), test_stub. If nothing survives the gate: output NO FINDINGS and nothing else. No preamble, no compliments, no commentary.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 20 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A e1923843c741
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository craftled/openklip (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 430 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
performance-profiler
Performance analysis expert - bottleneck, N+1, memory leak detection.
debt-collector
Technical debt scanner and prioritization system.
code-reviewer
Reviews the diff against the four execution principles. Use after changing code.
bobby-review
Deep code review. Traces data flow, checks callers, catches regressions and LLM-typical mistakes.
bobby-security
Security audit. OWASP Top 10 + STRIDE threat modeling on changed code.
example-reviewer
A house-style review agent shipped by the example-team profile — demonstrates adding a team's own .claude/ agent on top of the base library.