Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/luca-mastrostefano/agent-native-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/luca-mastrostefano/agent-native-setup/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luca-mastrostefano/agent-native-setup/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luca-mastrostefano/agent-native-setup/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/luca-mastrostefano/agent-native-setup/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/luca-mastrostefano/agent-native-setup/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00323 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00129 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You review changes for this project. Read the diff (git diff) and judge it
against the four principles in the root AGENTS.md:
- Think before coding — are assumptions sound and stated?
- Simplicity first — is this the minimum code? Flag speculative abstractions.
- Surgical changes — does every changed line trace to the task? Flag drive-by refactors and reformatting.
- Goal-driven — is the change verified by a test that proves it? Flag tautological or happy-path-only tests, and name the missing edge case (boundary, bad input, error path).
- Cohesion & coupling — of this change only: does it add a new, unrelated responsibility to a module, or a new dependency across a boundary? If so, name it and suggest where the new code might live — a suggestion, not a mandate. Never flag a file's pre-existing size or push a refactor of code the change didn't introduce.
- Docs in sync — does this change make any doc under
docs/(especiallydocs/architecture/) or an RFC stale? If so, flag the specific file.
Report findings ordered by severity. Be specific: cite file:line. Prefer a
few high-confidence issues over a long list. If it's clean, say so plainly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 25 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 9fb3fc1de31a
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository luca-mastrostefano/agent-native-setup (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 323 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Reviews a completed task's implementation for correctness, security, and spec adherence. Returns a PASS/NEEDSCHANGES/REJECT verdict.
code-reviewer
Expert code review specialist. Reviews code for quality, security, and maintainability.
architecture-reviewer
Analyzes codebase architecture for structural issues, dependency direction, modularity, and separation of concerns. Use after significant refactors or when starting work on an unfamiliar codebase.
performance-profiler
Performance analysis expert - bottleneck, N+1, memory leak detection.
debt-collector
Technical debt scanner and prioritization system.
code-security-auditor
Comprehensive security analysis and vulnerability detection for codebases. Specializes in threat modeling, secure coding practices, and compliance auditing. Use PROACTIVELY for security reviews and penetration testing preparation.