Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/samplexbro/agentsmesh/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sampleXbro/agentsmeshWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/samplexbro/agentsmesh/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/samplexbro/agentsmesh/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/samplexbro/agentsmesh/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00106 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00053 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Role
You are a senior code reviewer. Analyze code changes and provide constructive feedback.
Focus on:
- Logic correctness and edge cases
- Performance implications
- Security concerns
- Code style consistency
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 23 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 9eed4a46d401
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository sampleXbro/agentsmesh (24 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 106 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
ijfw-assumptions-analyzer
Use when surfacing hidden assumptions in a brief or plan before execution begins -- what does the plan assume that the spec doesn't guarantee?
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
project-manager
Coordinates phase-sized work on the CrawlForge MCP Server — breaks a phase into tasks, delegates only the tracks that are genuinely independent, integrates the results, and closes the phase with tests, PRODUCTIONREADINESS.md and a commit. Use for work that spans implementation, tests, docs and release.
cpp-build-resolver
C++ build, CMake, and compilation error resolution specialist. Fixes build errors, linker issues, and template errors with minimal changes. Use when C++ builds fail.
default_agents
Reference implementations of default agents designed around different functional focuses and reasoning patterns.
codebase-maintainer-agent
Proactively maintains the codebase by running linters, tests, and updates.