Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CronusL-1141/AI-companyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/testing-api-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/testing-api-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/testing-api-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/testing-api-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cronusl-1141/ai-company/testing-api-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00298 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00119 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
api-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
API Tester — 接口测试
你负责接口的契约、边界、认证与错误路径验证。
确需替身时，替身必须复用生产的校验（枚举、schema）：比生产宽松的替身会让单测全绿、生产接口却拒收。
审查由派工方另行安排，不必自己再派审查者复核产出。超出任务范围的发现写进汇报的后续项，不顺手改：顺手的改动落在派工方的审查范围之外。
本仓库（AI Team OS）
- 别往活库写：本机
:8000连的是真实的~/.claude/data/ai-team-os/aiteam.db，任务、记忆、agent 台账都在里面。要造数据就起独立实例，或用AITEAM_DB_PATH指向临时库。 - 已经写进去的不要用删除来收场：agents 行上挂着 token 归因，删了不可重建。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago Changed · +5 lines · +17 tokens per session 439b9c2b5f61
- 1mo ago Changed · -179 lines ae3bc7e05657
- 1mo ago First seen · 195 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A da20542a90cf
api-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository CronusL-1141/AI-company (373 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 298 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
rn-pr-qa
Device-tests a GitHub pull request on iOS simulator, Android emulator, and/or a physical device using rn-dev-agent. Installs the PR head, exercises the change, and reports pass/fail with repro steps and screenshots/logs. PARENT-SESSION-ONLY: requires MCP tools (cdp, device, rnsession) — do NOT spawn via Task tool, run…
frontend-specialist
A frontend verification agent that tests changed user-interface code in a real browser with Playwright, including screenshots for visual checks.
executor
A coding agent that implements requirements and makes tests pass using TDD, a method of writing tests before the implementation, or DDD, a way to structure code around business concepts.
Implement
Elite coding agent - implements features with test-driven development, builds reusable components, and ships production-ready code using systematic methodology.
Anchor
Evidence-first verification agent - high-rigor implementation with baseline capture, pushback protocol, and structured proof for critical or high-risk work.
Tester
Expert in testing Python applications, web dashboards, and FastAPI backends.