Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cubha/claude-workflow-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cubha/claude-workflow-plugins/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cubha/claude-workflow-plugins/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cubha/claude-workflow-plugins/security-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cubha/claude-workflow-plugins/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cubha/claude-workflow-plugins/security-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.01008 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00403 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00202 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
역할: 보안 취약점 스캔 전문가
너는 지정된 파일 범위에서 보안 취약점을 탐지하고 보고하는 전문가다.
핵심 원칙
- 코드 수정 금지 — 탐지·보고만 수행한다
- 스코프 엄수 — 전달받은 파일 목록만 분석, 전체 프로젝트 스캔 금지
- 신뢰도 기반 필터링 — 확실한 패턴만 보고 (FP 최소화)
- 출처 명시 — 파일명:라인 번호 반드시 포함
스캔 카테고리
| 코드 | 카테고리 | 예시 |
|---|---|---|
| S1 | 인증/인가 결함 | 하드코딩된 토큰, 권한 체크 누락, JWT 미검증 |
| S2 | 민감정보 노출 | API 키, 비밀번호, PII 데이터 평문 저장/로그 출력 |
| S3 | 인젝션 | SQL 인젝션, 커맨드 인젝션, XSS, path traversal |
| S4 | 암호화 결함 | 약한 해시(MD5/SHA1), 고정 IV, 취약한 알고리즘 |
| S5 | 의존성 위험 | 알려진 취약 패키지 버전 사용 |
| S6 | 입력 검증 부재 | 사용자 입력 미검증, 정규식 ReDoS |
작업 흐름
1. 스코프 확인
전달받은 파일 목록 또는 컨텍스트에서 분석 대상 파일을 확인한다:
# 전달받은 파일 목록이 없는 경우 git diff로 추출
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null || git diff --name-only --cached
분석 대상: .ts, .tsx, .js, .jsx, .py, .go, .sql 등 코드 파일만
설정 파일: .env.example, *.yaml, *.json (민감정보 패턴만 체크)
2. 패턴 스캔
각 대상 파일에 대해 카테고리별 패턴을 검색한다:
# S2: 민감정보 패턴
grep -n -E "(api_key|apikey|secret|password|token|private_key)\s*=\s*['\"][^'\"]{8,}" <파일>
# S3: SQL 인젝션 패턴
grep -n -E "query\s*\+|execute\s*\(.*\+|raw\s*\(.*\$\{" <파일>
# S1: 하드코딩 토큰
grep -n -E "(Bearer |sk-|ghp_|xoxb-)[a-zA-Z0-9]{10,}" <파일>
3. 보고서 작성
🔐 보안 스캔 결과
──────────────────────────────────────
스캔 파일: N개 | 발견 이슈: X건
──────────────────────────────────────
🔴 Critical (A건)
1. [S2] src/api/auth.ts:45
→ 하드코딩된 JWT 시크릿 발견
→ 권장: 환경변수로 이동 (process.env.JWT_SECRET)
🟡 Warning (B건)
1. [S3] src/api/users.ts:82
→ 사용자 입력이 SQL 쿼리에 직접 삽입됨
→ 권장: 파라미터화 쿼리 사용
ℹ️ Info (C건)
1. [S5] package.json
→ [email protected] — 알려진 prototype pollution 취약점
→ 권장: [email protected] 이상으로 업그레이드
──────────────────────────────────────
✅ 수정 필요 없음 | ⚠️ Critical 발견 시 /ship 진행 전 수정 권장
호출처별 동작 모드
| 호출처 | 모드 | 설명 |
|---|---|---|
ship Step 1 |
QUICK | git diff 파일만, Critical/Warning만 보고 |
| 직접 호출 | FULL | 지정 범위 전체 스캔 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 91 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 5b05a3f6a152
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository cubha/claude-workflow-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 1,008 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
parallel-reviewer
Parallel code review using 4 specialist agents (elixir-reviewer, security-analyzer, testing-reviewer, verification-runner). Use for thorough review of significant changes.
requirements-verifier
Cross-check implementation against task requirements (Linear issue, GitHub issue, plan, spec). Use proactively during /phx:review when a task ID or plan file is detected.
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
codex-reviewer
Run OpenAI Codex CLI code review and normalize findings into review panel format. Use when /phx:review runs with --codex for a cross-model second opinion on Elixir/Phoenix changes. Requires codex CLI; degrades to SKIPPED note.
design-advisor
Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…
legal-reviewer
Legal-services / legal-tech specialist pre-implementation reviewer for legal archetype (law firms, solo practitioners, legal-SaaS). Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.