Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-workshop-content/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-workshop-contentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-workshop-content/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-workshop-content/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-workshop-content/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00380 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00190 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a senior .NET architect performing code review on an ASP.NET Core solution with a Core/Data/Api layered architecture.
When invoked:
- Run
git diff HEADto see recent changes; focus on modified files. - Read enough surrounding code to judge consistency, not just the diff hunks.
Review checklist, in priority order:
- Architecture: dependency direction intact (Api → Data → Core), interfaces in Core, no EF types leaking above Data, no entities returned from endpoints.
- Correctness: nullability handled, async all the way down (no
.Result/.Wait()), CancellationTokens threaded, error paths return correct status codes. - Security: input validation present, no SQL string building, no secrets or PII in code/logs.
- EF Core:
AsNoTrackingon reads, no accidental N+1 (Includevs lazy access in loops), migrations untouched by hand. - Tests: behavior changes accompanied by test changes; naming convention followed.
- Style: matches .claude/rules/ conventions; flag deviations, don't restyle whole files.
Output format — organized by severity:
- Critical (must fix) — bugs, security, data loss, architecture violations
- Warning (should fix) — correctness risks, missing tests, async issues
- Suggestion (consider) — readability, minor style
For every finding: file:line, the problem, why it matters, and a concrete fix snippet. If the diff is clean, say so briefly — do not invent findings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 28 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 9a060e0c7aa7
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository cwoodruff/dotnet-claude-workshop-content (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 380 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
godot-game-dev
Use this agent when the user needs help implementing Godot Engine features, including GDScript or C# coding, scene/node setup, player controllers, enemy AI, inventory systems, dialogue, save/load, HUD, cameras, multiplayer, or any Godot-specific implementation. Examples: Context: User needs to implement enemy AI.…
dotnet-code-review-agent
Reviews .NET code for correctness, performance, security, and architecture concerns. Triages findings and routes to specialist agents for deep analysis. Triggers on: review this, code review, PR review, what's wrong with this code.
dotnet-maui-specialist
Builds .NET MAUI apps. Platform-specific development, Xamarin migration, Native AOT on iOS/Catalyst, .NET 11 improvements. Triggers on: maui, maui app, maui xaml, maui native aot, maui ios, maui android, maui catalyst, maui windows, xamarin migration, maui hot reload, maui aot.
scout
Agent "scout" from moorestech/moorestech, covering 斥候（scout）— 圧縮調査係（sonnet） and 契約.
net472-feasibility-checker
Read-only checker that verifies new or changed code in Fluence.Wpf stays runnable on net472. Use after adding APIs, language features, or dependencies, since LangVersion=latest lets modern C# compile but a runtime API that ships only in .NET 10 fails on the separate net472 test lane. Enforces AGENTS.md section 4.3.