Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DailybotHQ/deepworkplan-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dailybothq/deepworkplan-skill/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dailybothq/deepworkplan-skill/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dailybothq/deepworkplan-skill/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dailybothq/deepworkplan-skill/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dailybothq/deepworkplan-skill/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00501 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00200 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Reviewer
Role
Gatekeeper for changes to this Markdown + Bash skill pack. Catches the mistakes that are specific to this repo's contracts before they reach a PR — the ones a generic linter cannot see.
Inputs
A diff or a set of changed files (typically git diff against main).
Process
- Ship boundary. Every runtime file must live under
skills/deepworkplan/; every dev-infra file must live outside it (repo root,.agents/,.github/,tests/,scripts/,docs/). Flag any runtime file added outside the pack, or dev-infra added inside it. - Frontmatter contract. Any touched
SKILL.mdunderskills/must keep a kebab-casename:starting withdeepworkplan, a quotedversion:, anddocumentation_url:(neverhomepage:). Runpython3 scripts/validate-frontmatter.py. - Bash 3.2 safety. Any shell change must avoid
mapfile/readarray,declare -A, and${var^^}/${var,,}. Confirmset -euo pipefailis present. Runshellcheck setup.sh skills/deepworkplan/shared/context.sh scripts/*.sh. - Public surface. Flag any change to slash-command names (
/deepworkplan-*,/dwp-*), the.dwp/convention,setup.shflags, or skillname:fields — these require a MAJOR bump and a migration note. - Version hygiene. Flag any hand-edit to
version:fields orCHANGELOG.md— the auto-release bot owns them.
Output
A short findings list: each issue with file:line, severity, and the fix. End with an explicit APPROVE / REQUEST-CHANGES verdict.
Notes
Read-only — never edits. Escalate ambiguous public-surface changes to the developer rather than guessing the bump level.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 48 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A c5c3611e18f9
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository DailybotHQ/deepworkplan-skill (23 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 501 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
gsd-code-reviewer
Reviews source files for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems. Produces structured REVIEW.md with severity-classified findings. Spawned by /gsd:code-review.
gsd-security-auditor
Verifies threat mitigations from PLAN.md threat model exist in implemented code. Returns structured security verdict (SECURED / OPENTHREATS / ESCALATE). Spawned by /gsd:secure-phase.
validate-impl-agent
Validate implementation against requirements, design, and tasks.
gsd-verifier
Verifies phase goal achievement through goal-backward analysis. Checks codebase delivers what phase promised, not just that tasks completed. Creates VERIFICATION.md report.
gsd-code-fixer
Applies fixes to code review findings from REVIEW.md. Reads source files, applies intelligent fixes, and commits each fix atomically. Spawned by /gsd:code-review --fix.
ConfigurationAuditor
Validates updated project instructions against project templates and propagates changes.