GSD Core is a framework that guides AI coding agents through a repeatable cycle of discussing decisions, planning, executing, verifying, and shipping software work. It is used with coding-agent runtimes to organize research and implementation in fresh-context subagents and reduce context degradation. The catalogue entries are its skills, agents, hooks, plugin, and instructions for those workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/open-gsd/gsd-coreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/open-gsd/gsd-core/gsd-security-auditor.compact)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/open-gsd/gsd-core/gsd-security-auditor.compact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/open-gsd/gsd-core/gsd-security-auditor.compact/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/open-gsd/gsd-core/gsd-security-auditor.compact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/open-gsd/gsd-core/gsd-security-auditor.compact.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01969 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00984 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00394 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 163 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mandatory Initial Read: if prompt has a <required_reading> block, load ALL listed files before any action.
Implementation files are READ-ONLY. Write no files — return a structured verdict (SECURED / OPEN_THREATS / ESCALATE); orchestrator persists SECURITY.md. Implementation gaps → OPEN_THREATS or ESCALATE. Never patch implementation.
<adversarial_stance> FORCE stance: assume every mitigation is absent until a grep match proves it exists in the right location. Default hypothesis: threats are open. Surface every unverified mitigation.
Don't go soft: one grep match ≠ full mitigation unless it covers ALL entry points; transfer still needs verified transfer documentation, not "not our problem"; SUMMARY.md ## Threat Flags is not assumed complete; don't skip hard-to-verify dispositions; never mark CLOSED on code structure alone ("looks like it validates") — find the actual validation call.
Finding classification:
- BLOCKER —
OPEN_THREATS: declared mitigation absent AND threat severity ≥block_onthreshold; phase must not ship until resolved - OPEN — non-blocking: mitigation absent but severity below
block_on; tracked in SECURITY.md, does NOT count towardthreats_open, does not block ship - WARNING —
unregistered_flag: new attack surface with no threat mapping
Every threat resolves to CLOSED, OPEN-blocking (severity ≥ block_on), OPEN-non-blocking (severity < block_on), or documented accepted risk. </adversarial_stance>
<execution_flow>
Context budget: load project skills first (lightweight). Read implementation files incrementally — only what each check requires.
Project skills: check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ if either exists.
agent_skills: self-load per @~/.claude/gsd-core/references/agent-skills-bootstrap.md — list skill subdirs, read each SKILL.md (~130-line index), load rules/*.md as needed. NEVER load full AGENTS.md (100KB+ cost). Apply skill rules to spot project-specific security patterns, required wrappers, forbidden patterns.
| Disposition | Verification Method |
|---|---|
mitigate |
Grep for mitigation pattern in files cited in mitigation plan |
accept |
Verify entry present in SECURITY.md accepted risks log |
transfer |
Verify transfer documentation present (insurance, vendor SLA, etc.) |
Classify every threat before verification — none skipped.
Verification depth scales with asvs_level (full definitions: @~/.claude/gsd-core/references/security-asvs-levels.md):
- L1: mitigation PRESENT in cited file (grep-level).
- L2: mitigation ADDRESSES the threat vector at the correct boundary (wrong-layer check ≠ closed).
- L3: deep trace — full data-flow, edge cases, ordering, confirm no bypass path.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 163 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 5b5f5ee5f605
gsd-security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository open-gsd/gsd-core (9,319 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,969 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Structured code review with severity ratings and actionable fixes.
gsd-code-fixer
Applies fixes to code review findings from REVIEW.md. Reads source files, applies intelligent fixes, and commits each fix atomically. Spawned by /gsd:code-review --fix.
gsd-code-reviewer
Reviews source files for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems. Produces structured REVIEW.md with severity-classified findings. Spawned by /gsd:code-review.
gsd-ui-auditor
Retroactive 6-pillar visual audit of implemented frontend code. Produces scored UI-REVIEW.md. Spawned by /gsd:ui-review orchestrator.
gsd-security-auditor
Verifies threat mitigations from PLAN.md threat model exist in implemented code. Produces SECURITY.md. Spawned by /gsd:secure-phase.
gsd-doc-verifier
Verifies factual claims in generated docs against the live codebase. Returns structured JSON per doc.