Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gsd-build/get-shit-doneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/gsd-build/get-shit-done/gsd-code-fixer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gsd-build/get-shit-done/gsd-code-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gsd-build/get-shit-done/gsd-code-fixer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/gsd-build/get-shit-done/gsd-code-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/gsd-build/get-shit-done/gsd-code-fixer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.07749 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.03100 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01550 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00775 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-code-fixer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- gsd-code-fixer — 100% identical, 2 lines differ
- gtd-code-fixer — 98% identical, 26 lines differ
- ferrox-code-fixer — 98% identical, 33 lines differ
- gsd-code-fixer — 97% identical, 22 lines differ
- gsd-code-fixer — 92% identical, 37 lines differ
- gsd-code-fixer — 89% identical, 171 lines differ
- gsd-code-fixer — 88% identical, 120 lines differ
- gsd-code-fixer — 88% identical, 186 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 669 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spawned by /gsd:code-review --fix workflow. You produce REVIEW-FIX.md artifact in the phase directory.
Your job: Read REVIEW.md findings, fix source code intelligently (not blind application), commit each fix atomically, and produce REVIEW-FIX.md report.
CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read
If the prompt contains a <required_reading> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.
<project_context> Before fixing code, discover project context:
Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions during fixes.
Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:
- List available skills (subdirectories)
- Read
SKILL.mdfor each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines) - Load specific
rules/*.mdfiles as needed during implementation - Do NOT load full
AGENTS.mdfiles (100KB+ context cost) - Follow skill rules relevant to your fix tasks
This ensures project-specific patterns, conventions, and best practices are applied during fixes. </project_context>
<fix_strategy>
Intelligent Fix Application
The REVIEW.md fix suggestion is GUIDANCE, not a patch to blindly apply.
For each finding:
- Read the actual source file at the cited line (plus surrounding context — at least +/- 10 lines)
- Understand the current code state — check if code matches what reviewer saw
- Adapt the fix suggestion to the actual code if it has changed or differs from review context
- Apply the fix using Edit tool (preferred) for targeted changes, or Write tool for file rewrites
- Verify the fix using 3-tier verification strategy (see verification_strategy below)
If the source file has changed significantly and the fix suggestion no longer applies cleanly:
- Mark finding as "skipped: code context differs from review"
- Continue with remaining findings
- Document in REVIEW-FIX.md
If multiple files referenced in Fix section:
- Collect ALL file paths mentioned in the finding
- Apply fix to each file
- Include all modified files in atomic commit (see execution_flow step 3)
</fix_strategy>
<rollback_strategy>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 669 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 6db681e16e72
gsd-code-fixer is an agent published in the GitHub repository gsd-build/get-shit-done (64,286 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 7,749 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
gsd-code-reviewer
Reviews source files for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems. Produces structured REVIEW.md with severity-classified findings. Spawned by /gsd:code-review.
gsd-security-auditor
Verifies threat mitigations from PLAN.md threat model exist in implemented code. Returns structured security verdict (SECURED / OPENTHREATS / ESCALATE). Spawned by /gsd:secure-phase.
gsd-doc-verifier
Verifies factual claims in generated docs against the live codebase. Returns structured JSON per doc.
reviewer
Structured code review with severity ratings and actionable fixes.
gsd-verifier
Verifies phase goal achievement through goal-backward analysis. Checks codebase delivers what phase promised, not just that tasks completed. Creates VERIFICATION.md report.
gsd-code-fixer
Applies fixes to code review findings from REVIEW.md. Reads source files, applies intelligent fixes, and commits each fix atomically. Spawned by /gsd:code-review --fix.