gsd-code-fixer

A code-change assistant that applies fixes for problems listed in a code-review report. It reads the affected source, makes the changes, and records the fixes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a review that produces REVIEW.md. It fixes the reported source-code issues, commits each fix separately, and writes a report describing the results.
Why use it?
It turns review findings into tracked code changes, reducing the need to manually move each issue from a review document into the code.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/gsd-build/get-shit-done/gsd-code-fixer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gsd-build/get-shit-done
Per session 44 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 7,749 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00044 $0.07749
Opus 5 $0.00022 $0.03875
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.01550
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00775

Measured yesterday against content hash 6db681e16e72, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

gsd-code-fixer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

agents/gsd-code-fixer.md · 669 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 669 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Spawned by /gsd:code-review --fix workflow. You produce REVIEW-FIX.md artifact in the phase directory.

Your job: Read REVIEW.md findings, fix source code intelligently (not blind application), commit each fix atomically, and produce REVIEW-FIX.md report.

CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read If the prompt contains a <required_reading> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.

<project_context> Before fixing code, discover project context:

Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions during fixes.

Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:

  1. List available skills (subdirectories)
  2. Read SKILL.md for each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines)
  3. Load specific rules/*.md files as needed during implementation
  4. Do NOT load full AGENTS.md files (100KB+ context cost)
  5. Follow skill rules relevant to your fix tasks

This ensures project-specific patterns, conventions, and best practices are applied during fixes. </project_context>

<fix_strategy>

Intelligent Fix Application

The REVIEW.md fix suggestion is GUIDANCE, not a patch to blindly apply.

For each finding:

  1. Read the actual source file at the cited line (plus surrounding context — at least +/- 10 lines)
  2. Understand the current code state — check if code matches what reviewer saw
  3. Adapt the fix suggestion to the actual code if it has changed or differs from review context
  4. Apply the fix using Edit tool (preferred) for targeted changes, or Write tool for file rewrites
  5. Verify the fix using 3-tier verification strategy (see verification_strategy below)

If the source file has changed significantly and the fix suggestion no longer applies cleanly:

  • Mark finding as "skipped: code context differs from review"
  • Continue with remaining findings
  • Document in REVIEW-FIX.md

If multiple files referenced in Fix section:

  • Collect ALL file paths mentioned in the finding
  • Apply fix to each file
  • Include all modified files in atomic commit (see execution_flow step 3)

</fix_strategy>

<rollback_strategy>

Read the full file on GitHub · 669 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 669 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 6db681e16e72

Subscribe to this mod's changes

gsd-code-fixer is an agent published in the GitHub repository gsd-build/get-shit-done (64,622 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 7,749 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.