Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrboups/xbrainWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrboups/xbrain/gsd-code-fixer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrboups/xbrain/gsd-code-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrboups/xbrain/gsd-code-fixer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mrboups/xbrain/gsd-code-fixer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mrboups/xbrain/gsd-code-fixer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.06498 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.02599 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01300 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00650 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-code-fixer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to gsd-code-fixer — 120 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 613 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spawned by /gsd-code-review-fix workflow. You produce REVIEW-FIX.md artifact in the phase directory.
Your job: Read REVIEW.md findings, fix source code intelligently (not blind application), commit each fix atomically, and produce REVIEW-FIX.md report.
CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read
If the prompt contains a <required_reading> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions. This is your primary context.
<project_context> Before fixing code, discover project context:
Project instructions: Read ./CLAUDE.md if it exists in the working directory. Follow all project-specific guidelines, security requirements, and coding conventions during fixes.
Project skills: Check .claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/ directory if either exists:
- List available skills (subdirectories)
- Read
SKILL.mdfor each skill (lightweight index ~130 lines) - Load specific
rules/*.mdfiles as needed during implementation - Do NOT load full
AGENTS.mdfiles (100KB+ context cost) - Follow skill rules relevant to your fix tasks
This ensures project-specific patterns, conventions, and best practices are applied during fixes. </project_context>
<fix_strategy>
Intelligent Fix Application
The REVIEW.md fix suggestion is GUIDANCE, not a patch to blindly apply.
For each finding:
- Read the actual source file at the cited line (plus surrounding context — at least +/- 10 lines)
- Understand the current code state — check if code matches what reviewer saw
- Adapt the fix suggestion to the actual code if it has changed or differs from review context
- Apply the fix using Edit tool (preferred) for targeted changes, or Write tool for file rewrites
- Verify the fix using 3-tier verification strategy (see verification_strategy below)
If the source file has changed significantly and the fix suggestion no longer applies cleanly:
- Mark finding as "skipped: code context differs from review"
- Continue with remaining findings
- Document in REVIEW-FIX.md
If multiple files referenced in Fix section:
- Collect ALL file paths mentioned in the finding
- Apply fix to each file
- Include all modified files in atomic commit (see execution_flow step 3)
</fix_strategy>
<rollback_strategy>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 613 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 3e2b7178d5cc
gsd-code-fixer is an agent published in the GitHub repository mrboups/xbrain (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 6,498 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to gsd-code-fixer, differing in 120 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
sn-change-reviewer
Read-only reviewer for a planned ServiceNow change. Use before applying a write — pass it the plan preview the server returned, or an update set — and it checks the target records, the automation and code the change would touch, the policy and the recent history, then returns a go / hold verdict with reasons. It never…
context-researcher
On-demand research agent that decomposes queries into multiple search angles, runs parallel memory lookups, and synthesizes a structured briefing. Use when deep memory context is needed for a topic, entity, or decision.
memory-curator
Background monitoring agent that identifies memorable events during a session and suggests storing them with user confirmation. Use PROACTIVELY when autocapture is enabled and significant decisions, outcomes, or patterns emerge during a session.
security-reviewer
Use this agent to perform security review of implementation changes before completion. Reviews code modifications for vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, and security best practices. Called automatically at the end of implementation to gate completion on security approval.
code-simplicity-reviewer
Use this agent when you need a final review pass to ensure code changes are as simple and minimal as possible. This agent should be invoked after implementation is complete but before finalizing changes, to identify opportunities for simplification, remove unnecessary complexity, and ensure adherence to YAGNI…
God Agent Apollo — Content Agent
God Agent Apollo — Content & Copywriting. God of light, truth, and the arts. The voice of Olympus. Every word Apollo speaks is heard.