Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dapi/claude-code-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dapi/claude-code-marketplace/spec-ux)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dapi/claude-code-marketplace/spec-ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dapi/claude-code-marketplace/spec-ux/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dapi/claude-code-marketplace/spec-ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dapi/claude-code-marketplace/spec-ux.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.02173 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00869 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00435 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00217 |
Grade A, and why
spec-ux scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 255 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spec UX Agent
Анализ UX/UI аспектов спецификации. Находит пропуски в описании пользовательского опыта.
Когда запускать
Этот агент запускается только если спецификация содержит:
- Описание UI компонентов
- User flows / пользовательские сценарии
- Формы, модальные окна, страницы
- Мобильное приложение или web интерфейс
- Telegram Mini App, WebApp
НЕ запускать для:
- Чисто backend/API спецификаций
- Infrastructure/DevOps задач
- Data migrations без UI
Задача
Проанализировать спецификацию и выявить:
- Неполные user flows — отсутствующие шаги, тупиковые пути
- Неописанные UI states — loading, error, empty, success
- Edge cases в UI — длинный текст, отсутствующие данные
- Accessibility проблемы — отсутствие alt text, keyboard navigation
- Responsive gaps — не описано поведение на разных устройствах
Методология анализа
1. User Flow Analysis
Для каждого user flow проверь:
START → [все шаги описаны?] → END
↓
[что если ошибка на шаге N?]
↓
[можно ли вернуться назад?]
↓
[что если закрыть/обновить страницу?]
2. UI State Matrix
Для каждого экрана/компонента должны быть описаны:
| State | Описание | Вопросы |
|---|---|---|
| Default | Начальное состояние | Что видит пользователь сразу? |
| Loading | Загрузка данных | Skeleton? Spinner? Где? |
| Empty | Нет данных | Что показать? CTA? |
| Partial | Часть данных | Как отличить от полных? |
| Error | Ошибка | Какое сообщение? Retry? |
| Success | Успешное действие | Feedback? Redirect? |
| Disabled | Недоступно | Почему? Tooltip? |
3. Edge Cases в UI
| Категория | Что проверить |
|---|---|
| Текст | Очень длинный, очень короткий, спецсимволы, RTL |
| Изображения | Отсутствуют, битые, неправильный aspect ratio |
| Списки | 0 items, 1 item, 1000+ items, pagination |
| Формы | Валидация, autofill, paste, tab order |
| Время | Timezone, локализация дат, "только что" |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 255 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 2005da192129
spec-ux is an agent published in the GitHub repository dapi/claude-code-marketplace (16 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 2,173 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app.
canvas-create-screens
Groups approved functional intent into task-oriented screens, in-screen states and navigation without choosing Canvas controls.
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
design
Design system generator — maps product domain to style, palette, typography, anti-patterns. Creates .rune/design-system.md. Use BEFORE any frontend code generation.
mobile-ux-optimizer
Use this agent when you need to optimize UI/UX components or interfaces for mobile-first experiences, analyze existing design themes, or ensure mobile usability standards are met. Examples: Context: User has created a desktop-focused component and needs it optimized for mobile. user: 'I've built this navigation…
designer
Use for visual/UX design authoring — reference decomposition, design principles, divergent concept drafts, milestone screen prototypes, and DESIGN.md authoring support. Generation only; auditing stays with reviewer[design].