davepoon/buildwithclaude is a discovery hub and plugin marketplace for Claude Code extensions, including agents, commands, hooks, skills, plugins, MCP servers, and marketplace collections. Developers use it to browse, search, and find installation instructions for tools that extend Claude-related workflows. Catalogue entries include agents, plugins, commands, and skills from this collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davepoon/buildwithclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/davepoon/buildwithclaude/architect-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/davepoon/buildwithclaude/architect-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/davepoon/buildwithclaude/architect-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/davepoon/buildwithclaude/architect-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/davepoon/buildwithclaude/architect-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00209 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00084 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
architect-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert software architect focused on maintaining architectural integrity.
When invoked:
- Map changes within overall system architecture
- Verify adherence to established patterns and SOLID principles
- Analyze dependencies and check for circular references
- Evaluate abstraction levels and system modularity
- Identify potential scaling or maintenance issues
Process:
- Review service boundaries and responsibilities
- Check data flow and coupling between components
- Verify consistency with domain-driven design
- Evaluate performance implications of decisions
- Assess security boundaries and validation points
Provide:
- Architectural compliance assessment
- Pattern adherence verification report
- Dependency analysis with recommendations
- Modularity and maintainability evaluation
- Improvement suggestions with rationale
- Risk assessment for architectural decisions
Focus on long-term maintainability and system coherence.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 31 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 541487c1db58
architect-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository davepoon/buildwithclaude (3,660 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 209 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
upload-workflow-agent
This agent should be used when the user asks to "implement user uploads", "set up direct creator upload", "configure image uploads", "build upload form", "create upload endpoint", or needs complete frontend + backend upload workflow for Cloudflare Images.
nestjs-code-review-expert
Expert NestJS code reviewer that provides analysis of TypeScript best practices, NestJS patterns, and architectural issues. Reviews code for quality, maintainability, and adherence to NestJS conventions. Use PROACTIVELY after code changes or when implementing new features.
spring-boot-reviewer
Reviews Spring Boot codebases against all spring-boot skills for correctness, best practices, and Spring Boot 4 compatibility. Use when reviewing Spring Boot projects, validating implementations, or user mentions "review my Spring Boot code", "check Spring best practices", "Spring Boot review", "validate Spring…
review-agent
Reviews code for adherence to 37signals Rails conventions. Checks for rich models, CRUD controllers, state records, proper concerns, and Hotwire usage. WHEN: Requesting code review, architecture audit, quality analysis, or pattern compliance checks. WHEN NOT: Implementing features (use implement-agent), refactoring…
dotnet-architecture-reviewer
Reviews a .NET codebase or repository and produces a structured architecture report — layering and dependency-rule violations, coupling, CQRS/handler hygiene, EF Core boundary leaks, testability, and concrete prioritized fixes. Use when the user wants an architecture review, a "second opinion" on structure, a PR-level…
intent-auditor
Intent auditor. Role 1 (single-document): promise vs delivered reality — reads a shipping intent's Acceptance Criteria, its scope conditions and the delivered code diff, and emits one VSA-shaped verdict JSON: a per-criterion acceptance verdict, a honoured/diverged/missing audit, and a disposition for each scope…