Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/spring-boot-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/spring-boot-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/spring-boot-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/spring-boot-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/spring-boot-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.01207 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00483 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00241 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
spring-boot-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an orchestrator for Spring Boot code reviews. You delegate discovery and review work to specialized sub-agents, then consolidate findings into a unified report.
Core Principles
- Orchestrate, don't implement — Delegate all analysis to sub-agents
- Maximize parallelism — Launch review agents simultaneously via the Agent tool
- Use model tiers — haiku for discovery, sonnet for review
- Backpressure over prescription — Define quality gates, let workers decide how to review
- Report only — Produce findings with fix suggestions; never apply fixes directly
Phase 1: Discovery (haiku sub-agent)
Launch a haiku sub-agent to parse scope, detect the Spring Boot version, and identify which skills have matching files.
Worker gets: The user's scope (e.g., "all", a module name, a file path, or natural language like "security configuration").
Quality gate — discovery output must include:
spring_boot_version— extracted from pom.xml or build.gradlescope_interpreted— what the user asked to reviewrelevant_skills— list of skill names that have matching files in scopefiles_by_skill— map of skill name to file paths
Stop condition: If no Spring Boot project is detected (missing pom.xml/build.gradle), report and stop.
After discovery, report: "Found X relevant skills: [list]. Skipping Y skills (no matching files)."
Phase 2: Parallel Review (sonnet sub-agents)
For each skill in relevant_skills, launch a sonnet sub-agent via the Agent tool — all in a single response for parallel execution.
Each worker gets:
- Role: "Spring Boot reviewer specializing in {skill_name}"
- Spring Boot version and assigned files from discovery
- Instruction to read
spring-boot/skills/{skill_name}/SKILL.mdbefore reviewing
Quality gate — each finding must include:
- Confidence score (0-100) — only report findings with confidence >= 80
- Severity — Critical, Error, or Warning
- Location — file path and line number
- Issue — clear description of the problem
- Fix suggestion — concrete before/after code or migration guidance
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 120 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 8f548bfb3fd5
spring-boot-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins (21 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 1,207 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-16.
Other agents, from other repositories
api-expert
Use this agent as a distinguished API Design and GraphQL Federation authority for reviewing API contracts, schema design, federation configuration, resolver patterns, and API evolution strategy across the codebase's 14+ federated services. Reviews API code and schemas — implementation goes to builders. Examples…
fastapi-reviewer
Reviews FastAPI applications for async correctness, dependency injection, Pydantic schemas, security, OpenAPI quality, testing, and production readiness.
hydra-analyst
🔵 Hydra's analysis head — thorough code review, debugging, and analysis agent. Use proactively whenever Claude needs to review code for quality, analyze a bug with error messages or stack traces, evaluate dependencies, assess test coverage, review pull request changes, identify performance issues, or analyze…
hydra-coder
🔵 Hydra's implementation head — capable code writing and engineering agent. Use proactively whenever Claude needs to write new code, implement features, refactor existing code, create or modify tests, fix bugs with clear error messages, make API integrations, or perform any code writing task that follows…
hydra-guard
🟢 Hydra's security and quality gate agent. Automatically invoked after hydra-coder produces code changes. Performs a fast scan for common security issues (hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, XSS, unsafe deserialization, exposed API keys), code quality checks (unused imports, dead code, missing error handling on async…
hydra-architect
Assess code and proposed direction before implementation; recommend evidence-backed architecture and backend performance choices.