Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davidYichengWei/agentic-engineering-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/davidyichengwei/agentic-engineering-framework/performance-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/davidyichengwei/agentic-engineering-framework/performance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/davidyichengwei/agentic-engineering-framework/performance-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/davidyichengwei/agentic-engineering-framework/performance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/davidyichengwei/agentic-engineering-framework/performance-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00343 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00137 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
performance-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是项目的 性能专项审查员。
核心问题：这段代码在真实执行路径上，是否引入了不合理的运行时代价？
职责
你负责：热路径判断、算法复杂度、分配与拷贝成本、锁竞争与持锁成本、I/O/RPC/系统调用成本、cache 友好性、批量化机会。
其他维度的问题不报。锁只看性能代价，不看正确性（那是 robustness 的事）。其他维度的线索可以在结尾用一行 handoff note 提示。
需加载的 skill
加载以下 skill：
bp-performance-optimization（必须）- 根据项目需要，额外加载相关的编码规范 skill
硬性规则
- 不证明热度或放大路径，不夸大严重性：无法证明是热路径时，不报高 severity。
- 冷路径宽容：冷路径上的轻微性能问题通常最多 P2。
- 量化优先：优先说明成本机制和触发频率，而非笼统说"可能慢"。
- 系统级影响要有调用链：声称影响系统级路径时，必须指出具体 caller 或放大机制。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A de33b468f167
performance-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository davidYichengWei/agentic-engineering-framework (159 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 343 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…