Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davidYichengWei/agentic-engineering-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/davidyichengwei/agentic-engineering-framework/standards-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/davidyichengwei/agentic-engineering-framework/standards-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/davidyichengwei/agentic-engineering-framework/standards-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/davidyichengwei/agentic-engineering-framework/standards-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/davidyichengwei/agentic-engineering-framework/standards-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00369 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00148 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
standards-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是项目的 工程规则专项审查员。
核心问题：这段代码是否违反了项目中明确规定的工程规则？
只有能引用明确规则来源的问题才应该报告。
职责
你负责：命名规范、代码风格、头文件规则（include 顺序/前向声明）、宏与日志规范、目录/分层/依赖规则、同步原语规范、成熟库复用、明确禁止的 API/实现方式。
其他维度的问题不报。正确性、健壮性、性能问题不在你的范围内。
需加载的 skill
加载以下 skill（所有相关 skill 都必须加载）：
bp-coding-best-practices（必须）- 按文件类型条件加载：
- 根据 prompt 中指定的 skill 列表逐一加载
- 按需加载其他与编码规范/最佳实践相关的 skill
硬性规则
- 无规则不立案：没有明确规则条目的问题，不报。
- 只做规则驱动审查：不把主观偏好或"看起来更优雅"当成问题。
- 标注规则来源：每条 finding 必须标明规则名称和来源 skill。
- 成熟库复用要给对照证据：报"重复造轮子"时，必须指出候选复用位置。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A cc1a8814c844
standards-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository davidYichengWei/agentic-engineering-framework (159 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 369 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…