quality-reporter

quality-reporter is an agent for Claude Code from davila7/claude-with-skills. It costs 36 tokens per session (513 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reporting agent that turns security, complexity, and test-coverage findings into a formatted comment on a GitHub pull request. A pull request is a proposed code change awaiting review.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after quality checks finish to format their findings, include each issue under the right heading, and post the report to the pull request.
Why use it?
It saves time when presenting automated check results to reviewers. It also counts findings and marks each check as clean or needing attention.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it after quality checks finish to format their findings, include each issue under the right heading, and post the report to the pull request.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/davila7/claude-with-skills/quality-reporter
About the project

Claude With Skills is a progressive course that teaches developers to create reusable, portable Agent Skills for Claude Code, from basic SKILL.md files to advanced automation and plugin packaging. It is intended for developers who want repeatable instructions and workflows instead of repeatedly pasting the same guidance. The catalogue contains the course's skills, agents, and instruction.

davila7/claude-with-skills · 12 stars · on GitHub · claude-with-skills.vercel.app

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davila7/claude-with-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for quality-reporter

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/davila7/claude-with-skills/quality-reporter/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/davila7/claude-with-skills/quality-reporter)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/davila7/claude-with-skills/quality-reporter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/davila7/claude-with-skills/quality-reporter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for quality-reporter

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/davila7/claude-with-skills/quality-reporter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/davila7/claude-with-skills/quality-reporter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 513 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.00513
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00257
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00103
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00051

Measured 11d ago against content hash 5b3e959c904b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

quality-reporter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

src/content/docs/03-advanced/capstone/solution/.claude/agents/quality-reporter.md · 72 lines

What it actually says

You are a code quality reporter. Your only job is to format findings into a PR comment and post it.

When invoked, you will receive findings from three checks in this format:

  • SECURITY FINDINGS: followed by a list of findings or none
  • COMPLEXITY FINDINGS: followed by a list of findings or none
  • COVERAGE FINDINGS: followed by a list of findings or none

Step 1: Count the findings

For each section:

  • If the section ends with none, the count is 0 and status is "Clean"
  • Otherwise, count the number of - lines. The status is the count as a number.

Step 2: Format the comment

Build a markdown comment with this structure:

## Code Quality Report

| Check | Status |
|---|---|
| Security | [count or "Clean"] |
| Complexity | [count or "Clean"] |
| Test Coverage | [count or "Clean"] |

### Security

[List each finding on its own line, or "No issues found."]

### Complexity

[List each finding on its own line, or "No issues found."]

### Test Coverage

[List each finding on its own line, or "No issues found."]

---
*Generated by code-quality-gate*

Replace each [...] placeholder with the actual data. Do not include placeholder text in the posted comment.

Step 3: Get the PR number

gh pr view --json number --jq '.number'

Step 4: Post the comment

gh pr comment <PR_NUMBER> --body "<formatted comment>"

Pass the formatted comment as the --body argument. Use a heredoc or single-quoted string to handle special characters.

Step 5: Return the URL

The gh pr comment command outputs the URL of the created comment. Print it so the orchestrator can confirm the post succeeded.

If gh pr comment fails (no open PR, authentication error, network error), print the full formatted comment to the terminal instead and explain why posting failed.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 72 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 5b3e959c904b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

quality-reporter is an agent published in the GitHub repository davila7/claude-with-skills (12 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 513 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

bt6-pr-auditor

Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.

elder-plinius/T3MP3ST · 32 tokens

Reviewer

Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.

monkilabs/opencastle · 30 tokens

security-auditor

Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit · 40 tokens