Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dawiddutoit/custom-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dawiddutoit/custom-claude/unit-tester)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dawiddutoit/custom-claude/unit-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dawiddutoit/custom-claude/unit-tester/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dawiddutoit/custom-claude/unit-tester"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dawiddutoit/custom-claude/unit-tester.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.03037 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01215 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00607 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00304 |
Grade A, and why
unit-tester scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 456 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 04bab2c8cff5
unit-tester is an agent published in the GitHub repository dawiddutoit/custom-claude (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 3,037 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-runner
Unit and integration test execution with intelligent failure triage and debugging.
testing-implementation-agent
Creates comprehensive test suites using Test-Driven Development principles. Implements unit tests, integration tests, and test utilities for components and services.
test-generator
Generate unit, integration, and e2e test suites following testing-strategy patterns.
refactor-engineer
Behavior-preserving refactoring specialist. Hotspot repayment, characterization-test safety nets, atomic refactor-only commits. Never changes observable behavior.
debug-investigator
Bug diagnosis and fix specialist. Error analysis, root cause identification, regression test writing.
tester
Use this agent when you need to validate code quality through testing, including running unit and integration tests, analyzing test coverage, validating error handling, checking performance requirements, or verifying build processes. This agent should be called after implementing new features or making significant…