Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/code-reviewer-weeklygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/code-reviewer-weekly)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/code-reviewer-weekly"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude/code-reviewer-weekly.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.02688 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01344 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00538 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00269 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer-weekly scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · -4 lines 7246491dc973
- 6d ago First seen · 204 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A ad73c67037e4
code-reviewer-weekly is an agent published in the GitHub repository dbc-oduffy/coordinator-claude (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 2,688 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
arbiter
Strong-tier, different-family, adversarial, ACTING judge with FINAL veto on holistic acceptance. Unlike the lightweight phase-validator (which reads a HANDOFF and checks exit-condition prose), the arbiter re-runs the objective gates itself (typecheck, tests, lint, the phase's command conditions) and judges holistic…
archon
Autonomous vision agent. Decomposes vague or specific direction into campaign phases. Delegates to Marshals and specialists. Reviews output against quality standards. Maintains campaign state across invocations. Does not write code — orchestrates those who do.
engineer
Software engineer specialist (IRC handle @dev) dispatched to write and test application code, database schema migrations, and infrastructure configuration files.
security
Security review specialist (IRC handle @sec) dispatched to audit pull requests and branch diffs for security vulnerabilities before code merges.
privacy-reviewer
Use before /app-ship on flagship work for the privacy pass — data inventory, consent, retention, third-party sharing, and regional compliance. Distinct evidence set from security. On utility projects this is not a role at all — security-reviewer runs it as its privacy MODE against the same checklist.
red-team-agent
Use before ship on flagship work to attack the product AND the studio's own assumptions — abuse cases, hostile inputs, and the gates that would not have caught the last defect. Conditional role. Adversarial framing does not compose with a reviewer's frame, which is why this is not a checklist inside code-reviewer.