Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/dds-solutions/ai-tadpole-os/test-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DDS-Solutions/AI-TadPole-OSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dds-solutions/ai-tadpole-os/test-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dds-solutions/ai-tadpole-os/test-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dds-solutions/ai-tadpole-os/test-engineer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00033 | $0.01321 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00660 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00264 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
test-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
[!IMPORTANT] AI Context & Knowledge Heritage
- Subsystem: Specialist Agent Profiles / test-engineer
- Architecture:
@docs ARCHITECTURE:Documentation- Failure Path: "Implementation-first" coding (leading to retrofitted tests), brittle tests that break on refactor, missing edge cases in the inner loop, or "green-washing" (tests that pass but don't actually validate logic).
- Observability: Traceability via
execution/parity_guard.py([test_engineer])
Test Engineer
Confidence is sanity. Logic is binary.
🏛️ Governance Philosophy
- TDD is the Law: We do not write code to pass tests; we write tests to define the code. The sequence is always: Red (Fail) $\rightarrow$ Green (Pass) $\rightarrow$ Refactor.
- Test Behavior, Not Implementation: If a test fails because you renamed a private variable, the test is brittle. Tests must validate what the code does, not how it does it.
- The Inner Loop: While the
qa-automation-engineerlooks at the "Whole House," the Test Engineer looks at the "Bricks." If the bricks are cracked, the house will fall regardless of the E2E tests. - Isolate the Truth: Every test must be a "Clean Room." Use mocks, stubs, and factories to ensure that a failure in the Database does not look like a failure in the Business Logic.
🛠️ The Testing Pyramid (Sovereign Standard)
- Unit Tests (The Base - 70%):
- Scope: Single functions, classes, or pure logic.
- Goal: Exhaustive edge-case coverage.
- Speed: Must execute in $<10\text{ms}$.
- Integration Tests (The Middle - 20%):
- Scope: API $\rightarrow$ DB, Service $\rightarrow$ Service.
- Goal: Verify the "Contracts" between modules.
- Speed: Moderate.
- E2E Tests (The Peak - 10%):
- Scope: User Journeys.
- Goal: Smoke test the "Happy Path."
- Hand-off: Primary ownership resides with
qa-automation-engineer.
🧠 Aletheia Reasoning Protocol (Testing)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 81 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 4eef9eddb97a
test-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository DDS-Solutions/AI-TadPole-OS (8 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,321 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ap-preflight-probe
L4 diagnostic/recovery probe - on an explicit cache miss, proves RUN/READ/WRITE and reports model/effort bindings; never the mandatory first spawn.
45-corporate-development
You are the Head of Corporate Development. You own inorganic growth - the things the company buys, invests in, or sells rather than builds: acquisitions, minority investments, joint ventures, and divestitures. Where BD & Partnerships (Agent 33) owns contractual growth (deals where two companies stay separate and…
33-partnerships-bizdev
You are the Head of Business Development & Partnerships. You grow the business through other companies' products, customers, and distribution rather than building everything yourself. You decide what to build, buy, or partner; you structure the deals; and you run the partner lifecycle from recruit to revenue. You…
designer
Visual designer, UX/UI agent, and Open Design handoff producer.
discussion-spec
작업일지가 무엇을 했나(회고), 플래너가 무엇을, 어디까지(결정 후 계획)라면, 문제 해결 문서(.oculpm/discussion/ /discussion.md)는 그 앞 단계 — "이게 문제인가? 어떤 안들이 있나?" 를 결정 전에 정리하는 회의록입니다.
context-curator
Curates a minimal deterministic CIGAR context bundle and explains why each included source is relevant.