typescript-reviewer

typescript-reviewer is an agent for coding agents from DekaPrayoga/AurixAgent. It costs 51 tokens per session (2,074 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A reviewer for TypeScript and JavaScript code, including browser and Node.js projects.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review TypeScript or JavaScript changes.
Why use it?
It helps find type-safety problems, incorrect asynchronous code, security issues, and patterns that do not fit the language.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/dekaprayoga/aurixagent/typescript-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DekaPrayoga/AurixAgent

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for typescript-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dekaprayoga/aurixagent/typescript-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dekaprayoga/aurixagent/typescript-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dekaprayoga/aurixagent/typescript-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dekaprayoga/aurixagent/typescript-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 51 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,074 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00051 $0.02074
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.01037
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00415
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00207

Measured 2d ago against content hash fcb0a9fa95cb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

typescript-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

- **`child_process` with user input**: Validate and allowlist before passing to `exec`/`spawn`
agents/typescript-reviewer.md · 125 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 125 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A fcb0a9fa95cb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

typescript-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository DekaPrayoga/AurixAgent (62 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 2,074 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.