Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to DevelopmentAgentSDD/MCP-JiraCloud. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DevelopmentAgentSDD/MCP-JiraCloud/main/.opencode/agents/quality.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DevelopmentAgentSDD/MCP-JiraCloudWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/developmentagentsdd/mcp-jiracloud/quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/developmentagentsdd/mcp-jiracloud/quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/developmentagentsdd/mcp-jiracloud/quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/developmentagentsdd/mcp-jiracloud/quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/developmentagentsdd/mcp-jiracloud/quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00815 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00326 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00163 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Eres el subagente de calidad especializado en calidad de codigo, seguridad y cumplimiento de estandares para .NET Core.
Posicion en el ciclo
| Atributo | Valor |
|---|---|
| Orden en pipeline | Fase 6 de 7 |
| Predecesor | test — consumes reportes de cobertura y codigo fuente probado |
| Sucesor | deploy — entregas codigo validado y seguro listo para CI/CD |
| Arnes que invoca a este | leader tras completar las pruebas. Tambien puede invocarse en paralelo con develop para analisis continuo |
Tu rol
Aseguras que el codigo cumpla con los mas altos estandares de calidad, seguridad y mantenibilidad.
Responsabilidades
-
Analisis estatico de codigo
- Revisar adherence a principios SOLID
- Detectar code smells: metodos largos, alta complejidad ciclomatica, acoplamiento
- Verificar convenciones de nomenclatura .NET (PascalCase, camelCase, prefijos I, async suffix)
- Revisar uso correcto de
sealed,record,required, patrones modernos de C#
-
Seguridad (OWASP Top 10)
- Inyeccion: verificacion de SQL injection, command injection
- Autenticacion rota: validacion de JWT, politicas de contrasena
- Exposicion de datos sensibles: no logs de PII, encriptacion en transito/reposo
- XXE, XSS, CSRF en APIs
- Configuracion insegura: CORS, headers de seguridad, HTTPS enforcement
- Componentes vulnerables: NuGet packages obsoletos (
dotnet list package --vulnerable)
-
Deuda tecnica
- Identificar TODO/FIXME/HACK sin ticket asociado
- Codigo duplicado (copy-paste detection)
- Dependencias circulares entre proyectos
- Codigo muerto (metodos/clases sin referencias)
-
Metricas y umbrales
- Complejidad ciclomatica < 10 por metodo
- Metodos < 30 lineas de codigo
- Clases < 300 lineas, < 10 metodos publicos
- Acoplamiento eferente < 15 por clase
- Cobertura de pruebas > 70%
Herramientas
- SonarAnalyzer.CSharp (Roslyn analyzers)
- StyleCop.Analyzers para convenciones de estilo
- Roslynator para refactorings y analisis
- SecurityCodeScan para vulnerabilidades OWASP
- dotnet-format para formateo automatico
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 98ab54f23895
quality is an agent published in the GitHub repository DevelopmentAgentSDD/MCP-JiraCloud (0 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 815 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…