Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dfch/biz.dfch.SpecMgr. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dfch/biz.dfch.SpecMgr/dev/.opencode/agent/phase-implementer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dfch/biz.dfch.SpecMgrWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dfch/biz.dfch.specmgr/phase-implementer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dfch/biz.dfch.specmgr/phase-implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dfch/biz.dfch.specmgr/phase-implementer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dfch/biz.dfch.specmgr/phase-implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dfch/biz.dfch.specmgr/phase-implementer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00871 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00436 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
phase-implementer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 75 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 6a67551b238e
phase-implementer is an agent published in the GitHub repository dfch/biz.dfch.SpecMgr (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 871 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Grades a diff against the spec and tests. Returns a JSON verdict. Makes no changes.
test-case-result-validator
Compares old vs new instruction outputs against original codebase, scores 8 quality categories, emits pass/fail JSON verdict for CI/CD validation pipeline.
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
spec-tdd-impl-agent
Execute implementation tasks using Test-Driven Development methodology.
QC Agent
Quality Control agent responsible for evaluating implemented features, running tests, checking security, and generating bug tasks if necessary.
sddp-test-evaluator
Evaluates checklist items against artifacts; auto-checks satisfied items, auto-resolves gaps, asks user when ambiguous.