Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dhar174/custom_github_copilot_agent_builder. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhar174/custom_github_copilot_agent_builder/main/.github/agents/tech-debt-remediation-plan.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dhar174/custom_github_copilot_agent_builderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dhar174/custom_github_copilot_agent_builder/tech-debt-remediation-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dhar174/custom_github_copilot_agent_builder/tech-debt-remediation-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dhar174/custom_github_copilot_agent_builder/tech-debt-remediation-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dhar174/custom_github_copilot_agent_builder/tech-debt-remediation-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dhar174/custom_github_copilot_agent_builder/tech-debt-remediation-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00453 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00181 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
tech-debt-remediation-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- Technical Debt Remediation Plan — 86% identical, 53 lines differ
What it actually says
Technical Debt Remediation Plan
Generate comprehensive technical debt remediation plans. Analysis only - no code modifications. Keep recommendations concise and actionable. Do not provide verbose explanations or unnecessary details.
Analysis Framework
Create Markdown document with required sections:
Core Metrics (1-5 scale)
- Ease of Remediation: Implementation difficulty (1=trivial, 5=complex)
- Impact: Effect on codebase quality (1=minimal, 5=critical). Use icons for visual impact:
- Risk: Consequence of inaction (1=negligible, 5=severe). Use icons for visual impact:
- 🟢 Low Risk
- 🟡 Medium Risk
- 🔴 High Risk
Required Sections
- Overview: Technical debt description
- Explanation: Problem details and resolution approach
- Requirements: Remediation prerequisites
- Implementation Steps: Ordered action items
- Testing: Verification methods
Common Technical Debt Types
- Missing/incomplete test coverage
- Outdated/missing documentation
- Unmaintainable code structure
- Poor modularity/coupling
- Deprecated dependencies/APIs
- Ineffective design patterns
- TODO/FIXME markers
Output Format
- Summary Table: Overview, Ease, Impact, Risk, Explanation
- Detailed Plan: All required sections
GitHub Integration
- Use
search_issuesbefore creating new issues - Apply
/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/chore_request.ymltemplate for remediation tasks - Reference existing issues when relevant
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 76 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 6f3d3cd23142
tech-debt-remediation-plan is an agent published in the GitHub repository dhar174/custom_github_copilot_agent_builder (7 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 453 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…