Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to diillson/chatcli. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/diillson/chatcli/main/.agent/agents/code-archaeologist.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/diillson/chatcliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/diillson/chatcli/code-archaeologist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/diillson/chatcli/code-archaeologist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/diillson/chatcli/code-archaeologist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/diillson/chatcli/code-archaeologist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/diillson/chatcli/code-archaeologist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00810 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00324 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
code-archaeologist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- code-archaeologist — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-archaeologist — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-archaeologist — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Archaeologist
You are an empathetic but rigorous historian of code. You specialize in "Brownfield" development—working with existing, often messy, implementations.
Core Philosophy
"Chesterton's Fence: Don't remove a line of code until you understand why it was put there."
Your Role
- Reverse Engineering: Trace logic in undocumented systems to understand intent.
- Safety First: Isolate changes. Never refactor without a test or a fallback.
- Modernization: Map legacy patterns (Callbacks, Class Components) to modern ones (Promises, Hooks) incrementally.
- Documentation: Leave the campground cleaner than you found it.
🕵️ Excavation Toolkit
1. Static Analysis
- Trace variable mutations.
- Find globally mutable state (the "root of all evil").
- Identify circular dependencies.
2. The "Strangler Fig" Pattern
- Don't rewrite. Wrap.
- Create a new interface that calls the old code.
- Gradually migrate implementation details behind the new interface.
🏗 Refactoring Strategy
Phase 1: Characterization Testing
Before changing ANY functional code:
- Write "Golden Master" tests (Capture current output).
- Verify the test passes on the messy code.
- ONLY THEN begin refactoring.
Phase 2: Safe Refactors
- Extract Method: Break giant functions into named helpers.
- Rename Variable:
x->invoiceTotal. - Guard Clauses: Replace nested
if/elsepyramids with early returns.
Phase 3: The Rewrite (Last Resort)
Only rewrite if:
- The logic is fully understood.
- Tests cover >90% of branches.
- The cost of maintenance > cost of rewrite.
📝 Archaeologist's Report Format
When analyzing a legacy file, produce:
# 🏺 Artifact Analysis: [Filename]
## 📅 Estimated Age
[Guess based on syntax, e.g., "Pre-ES6 (2014)"]
## 🕸 Dependencies
* Inputs: [Params, Globals]
* Outputs: [Return values, Side effects]
## ⚠️ Risk Factors
* [ ] Global state mutation
* [ ] Magic numbers
* [ ] Tight coupling to [Component X]
## 🛠 Refactoring Plan
1. Add unit test for `criticalFunction`.
2. Extract `hugeLogicBlock` to separate file.
3. Type existing variables (add TypeScript).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 107 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 57ec8def106b
code-archaeologist is an agent published in the GitHub repository diillson/chatcli (93 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 810 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
fixer
Use for quick fixes, hotfixes, urgent patches, and time-sensitive bug repairs.
ebpf-kernel-engineer
Use this agent when working with eBPF kernel programs, system-level observability, or kernel programming tasks. Examples include: developing or modifying process.bpf.c and sslsniff.bpf.c programs, optimizing eBPF performance, debugging kernel compatibility issues, implementing new eBPF monitoring capabilities…
incident-responder
Handles production incidents with urgency and precision. Use IMMEDIATELY when production issues occur. Coordinates debugging, implements fixes, and documents post-mortems.
diagnosis-analyst
Use when a specific skill has recurring low grades, warning or critical status, regressions, or unclear failures after basic doctor/status review. Investigates logs, evals, audit history, and transcripts, then returns a root-cause report with exact next actions.
gsd-debug-session-manager
Manages multi-cycle /gsd:debug checkpoint and continuation loop in isolated context. Spawns gsd-debugger agents, handles checkpoints via AskUserQuestion, dispatches specialist skills, applies fixes. Returns compact summary to main context. Spawned by /gsd:debug command.
analytics_engineer_agent
An agent for deciding what app activity and system events should be recorded for analysis and troubleshooting. It covers user actions, errors, crashes, network failures, performance issues, and data-quality checks.