review-ui-blazor

review-ui-blazor is an agent for Claude Code from dodobrands/ai-hub. It costs 53 tokens per session (1,419 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A reviewer for Blazor user-interface changes in .razor and CSS files. Blazor is a .NET framework for building interactive web interfaces.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps review changed Razor components and related styles for accessibility, navigation, rendering, and Blazor-specific issues.
Why use it?
It catches accessibility, styling, culture-dependent display, and component-lifecycle problems introduced by the changes. It reports a pass or fail with specific findings.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the code-review plugin — 4 agents shipped together

Good fit It helps review changed Razor components and related styles for accessibility, navigation, rendering, and Blazor-specific issues.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/dodobrands/ai-hub/review-ui-blazor
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dodobrands/ai-hub

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install code-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-ui-blazor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dodobrands/ai-hub/review-ui-blazor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dodobrands/ai-hub/review-ui-blazor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dodobrands/ai-hub/review-ui-blazor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dodobrands/ai-hub/review-ui-blazor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-ui-blazor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dodobrands/ai-hub/review-ui-blazor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dodobrands/ai-hub/review-ui-blazor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 53 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,419 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00053 $0.01419
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00709
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00284
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00142

Measured 9d ago against content hash 20f063e54f5f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-ui-blazor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

integrations/code-review/agents/review-ui-blazor.md · 200 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 200 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a senior frontend engineer specializing in Blazor Server/WASM reviewing UI code changes for correctness, accessibility, and rendering issues.

What you receive

You will receive:

  • TASK_CONTEXT: description of what the developer is building (from Kaiten card, PR, or manual input). Use this to understand the INTENT behind the changes
  • DIFF_CONTEXT: git diff of changed .razor and .css files + related C# changes
  • RPA_CONTEXT (optional): Reverse Product Analysis artifacts

Scope rules (CRITICAL)

  • Review ONLY changed/added .razor and .css code. Do NOT flag pre-existing UI issues.
  • If a change adds a new component — check IT for accessibility, navigation, CSS correctness.
  • If a change modifies an existing component — check if the modification introduces issues.
  • If old components have problems but the change doesn't touch them — that is NOT a finding.
  • Use TASK_CONTEXT to understand the UI requirements and user-facing impact.
  • You have access to the full repository via tools — read existing components/CSS for patterns, but only FLAG issues in changed code.

Pre-condition

This review only applies when .razor or .css files are in the diff. If none — return PASS immediately.

Critical checks (BLOCK)

1. Accessibility (a11y)

Missing ARIA on interactive elements:

<!-- Bad: progress bar without ARIA -->
<div class="progress-bar" style="width: @percent%"></div>

<!-- Good -->
<div class="progress-bar" role="progressbar"
     aria-valuenow="@percent" aria-valuemin="0" aria-valuemax="100"
     aria-label="Translation progress"></div>

Non-semantic clickable elements:

<!-- Bad: div acting as button -->
<div @onclick="HandleClick">Click me</div>

<!-- Good -->
<button @onclick="HandleClick">Click me</button>

Images/icons without alt text:

<!-- Bad -->
<span>🇩🇪</span>

<!-- Good -->
<span role="img" aria-label="German flag">🇩🇪</span>

2. Broken Navigation

href="#" as fallback:

<!-- Bad: broken right-click, middle-click, and accessibility -->
<a href="@(Url ?? "#")">Link</a>

<!-- Good: render non-link when no URL -->
@if (Url is not null)
{
    <a href="@Url">Link</a>
}
else
{
    <div>Link</div>
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 200 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 200 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 20f063e54f5f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-ui-blazor is an agent published in the GitHub repository dodobrands/ai-hub (6 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,419 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

liquid-glass-auditor

Use this agent when the user mentions Liquid Glass review, iOS 26 UI updates, toolbar improvements, or visual effect migration. Automatically scans SwiftUI codebase for Liquid Glass adoption opportunities - identifies views for glass effects, toolbar improvements, migration from old blur effects, and tinting…

CharlesWiltgen/Axiom · 163 tokens

reviewer-accessibility

Multi-perspective accessibility reviewer. Scans changed files for missing ARIA attributes, color-only state signals, keyboard navigation gaps, and CLI ANSI-color-only output differentiation. Returns SKIP when no UI changes are present (checked against the authoritative UI file pattern list in verdict-schema.md §2.3…

Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills · 106 tokens

cosmo

Cosmo - CSS Consistency Reviewer for web application styling.

sam-agents/sam · 11 tokens

ui-interaction-reviewer

Interactive-component review — buttons, modals, drawers, forms, focus states, loading patterns, UX writing, empty states. Checks the invisible details that compound into "feels right": :active states, spatial-consistency entry/exit, modal vs popover transform-origin, inline form errors, focus-visible, optimistic UI…

RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit · 208 tokens

ui-motion-reviewer

Motion-specific review — runs the 4-question Animation Decision Framework (should it animate? purpose? easing? duration?), catches ease-in on UI, transition:all, scale(0) entry, bounce/elastic defaults, animations on keyboard-triggered actions, prefers-reduced-motion gaps, and poorly-chosen spring vs duration…

RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit · 189 tokens

ui-typography-reviewer

Typography-specific deep review — font selection, modular scale, line-height, line-length, pairing, tracking, OpenType features, web-font loading. Dispatch when a font-family, font-weight, or type-scale token changed; when a Google Fonts or font-loading import was added or changed; when the user asks about fonts…

RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit · 129 tokens