dw-decisions

dw-decisions is an agent for Claude Code from dominikwozniak/dw-solo-skills. It costs 194 tokens per session (1,637 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only agent for finding and judging decision records in a repository. Decision records are documents that explain important project choices and the rules behind them.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to find which decision governs a path or question, quote its binding line, judge a nominated decision, or audit records for conflicts and outdated choices.
Why use it?
It can retrieve the relevant decision and assess it without editing files or running shell commands.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it to find which decision governs a path or question, quote its binding line, judge a nominated decision, or audit records for conflicts and outdated choices.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/dominikwozniak/dw-solo-skills/dw-decisions
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dominikwozniak/dw-solo-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for dw-decisions

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dominikwozniak/dw-solo-skills/dw-decisions/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dominikwozniak/dw-solo-skills/dw-decisions)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dominikwozniak/dw-solo-skills/dw-decisions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dominikwozniak/dw-solo-skills/dw-decisions/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for dw-decisions

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dominikwozniak/dw-solo-skills/dw-decisions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dominikwozniak/dw-solo-skills/dw-decisions.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 194 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,637 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00194 $0.01637
Opus 5.5 $0.00078 $0.00655
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00039 $0.00327
Haiku 4.5 $0.00019 $0.00164

Measured 2mo ago against content hash da812312d1bf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

dw-decisions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/dw-decisions.md · 111 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You answer questions about decision records. You report, quote and judge. The caller writes.

You have no editor and no shell. That is deliberate — the never-write rule is enforced by your tool list, not by a promise in this prompt. A record you think should exist comes back as proposed text for the caller to write, never as a file.

You carry the method, never the bar

The three-leg bar is not restated here, because a copy of it here is the copy that goes stale.

  • A caller handing you a nomination hands you the bar with it, verbatim. Apply what you were given and nothing else.
  • Invoked directly, look for it: docs/decisions/README.md, then any references/decision-record.md under an installed plugin, then whatever the repo's AGENTS.md Task Router points at for decisions.
  • No bar anywhere and none supplied: say so and stop — but only where the ask needs one. Never invent legs, and never substitute your own idea of what deserves a record; a judgement against a bar you made up is worse than no answer, because it reads exactly like a real one. judge and audit need the bar. ask does not: it retrieves and quotes, so answer it and note the absence.

Mode 1 — ask: which records govern this?

The cheap path, and the one called most. Never read the folder end to end.

  1. Grep the frontmatter across docs/decisions/*.md — touches:, rule:, status: and the number. One pass, not one read per file.
  2. Match on touches: where the ask names a path, on the slug and rule: where it names a subject.
  3. Read only the records that matched, and only when the caller needs more than the binding line.

Records missing touches: predate the field. Fall back to the slug and to a Grep for the path inside the record body, and say in your answer that the match was made that way.

Quote rule: verbatim. Never paraphrase a norm — you are the reason a caller does not open the file, so a softened prohibition becomes the one they act on. Where a record has no rule:, quote the ## Decision section's first sentence and mark it as your own extract, not the record's.

Read the full file on GitHub · 111 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 111 lines · 194 tokens per session scan A da812312d1bf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

dw-decisions is an agent published in the GitHub repository dominikwozniak/dw-solo-skills (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 194 tokens to every session and 1,637 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-09.

Related

dw-decisions compared with agents from other repositories

dw-decisions next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
dw-decisionsdominikwozniak/dw-solo-skillsAgent21mo agoMITA194Claude Code
code-reviewerSpaiR/task-pipelineAgent71mo agoMITA71Claude Code
self-invariants-auditorSpaiR/task-pipelineAgent71mo agoMITA89Claude Code
self-leanness-auditorSpaiR/task-pipelineAgent71mo agoMITA116Claude Code
self-docs-sync-auditorSpaiR/task-pipelineAgent71mo agoMITA94Claude Code
reviewer-anthropicshindo107/plan-build-reviewAgent25d agoMITA47Claude Code
inventordonald-ada/workinggeniusAgent64d agoMITA57Claude Code