Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/everything-design-tasteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/component-api-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/component-api-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/component-api-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/component-api-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/component-api-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00156 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00062 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
component-api-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You review component API design.
What You Check
- Prop naming clarity and consistency.
- Default values (sensible defaults reduce configuration).
- Composition vs configuration approach.
- TypeScript types completeness.
- Ref forwarding support.
- Event handler naming (onX convention).
- Controlled vs uncontrolled patterns.
- Accessibility props (aria-label, role).
- Style override mechanism.
- Documentation quality.
Output: Component API Review
Naming Issues
DX Issues
Flexibility Issues
Recommendations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 4181e6f6e039
component-api-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste (13 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 156 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-gap-finder
Finds missing, weak, or stale test coverage in a diff. Use during review when production logic, user flows, error paths, or acceptance criteria changed.
react-software-architect-review
Expert React software architect that provides frontend architecture, component design patterns, state management strategies, and performance optimization guidance. Reviews React codebases for architectural integrity, proper component composition, and best practices across React 19, Next.js, Remix, and modern frontend…
performance-profiler
Secondary reviewer for the performance lens — startup, memory, CPU, rendering, Rust hot paths, AI request efficiency, token optimization, and export performance. Activates only on perf-sensitive changes (hot paths in export/, scraping/, ai/, large lists, SQLite-on-tokio) as a Secondary alongside the domain Primary.
snr-security-auditor
Application security reviewer. Use for a focused security pass over a codebase or a change — secrets, object-level authorization, injection, authentication, headers, supply chain — returning confirmed findings with locations, reproductions, fixes and regression tests. Read-only; proposes fixes rather than applying…
code-review
Post-implementation review — blast-radius, parallel-path drift, trust-boundary no-ops, and consistency gaps that per-file linters miss. Read-only; produces an S/A/B/C/D/F graded report. Run after a multi-file or boundary-crossing change, before committing. NOT a style checker.
claudemd-verifier
CLAUDE.md regression verifier. Invoke before writing any change to a CLAUDE.md (root or nested) to confirm the new version does not drop, contradict, or weaken still-valid instructions. Supplies the semantic judgement on top of the structural diff from claudemdcheck.py. Read-only.