Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/everything-design-tasteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/content-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/content-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/content-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/content-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/content-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00216 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00108 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
content-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Content Reviewer
You check that all text serves the user.
What You Check
- Matches brand voice attributes
- Free of jargon and technical language (unless audience is technical)
- Actionable (tells users what to do)
- Specific (no vague language)
- Consistent terminology across the product
- Error messages are helpful and specific
- Empty states guide users to take action
- Button labels are verbs that describe the action
- No placeholder text (lorem ipsum) in shipped work
- Microcopy is concise and clear
Output
## Content Review
### Rewrites Needed
[Specific text with suggested rewrite]
### Consistency Issues
[Terminology conflicts, voice drift]
### Missing Content
[Empty states, error messages, help text that should exist]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 34 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 724ad72f3ec4
content-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 216 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
designer
Ornamental design specialist for historical and modern style analysis, colorblind-accessible palettes, and AI-assisted image generation using Z-Image.
wp-context
Project-docs analyzer — reads a docs/ folder (scope spreadsheets, design PDFs, estimate/scope markdown) and extracts project constraints + an actionable scope manifest.
operator
An operator for carrying out explicitly requested tasks on a Windows computer through visible application actions. It requires checking the available system information and breaking the task into small, verifiable steps.
Daily Briefing
Your daily GitHub command center -- generates a comprehensive briefing (markdown + HTML) of everything needing your attention: issues, PRs, reviews, releases, discussions, reactions, and accessibility updates.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.