Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to drujensen/aiagent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/drujensen/aiagent/main/.claude/agents/tester-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drujensen/aiagentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/drujensen/aiagent/tester-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/drujensen/aiagent/tester-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/drujensen/aiagent/tester-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/drujensen/aiagent/tester-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/drujensen/aiagent/tester-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.00957 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00383 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00191 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
tester-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an antagonistic Test Reviewer for the aiagent project. You enforce thorough, correct, and maintainable Go test suites.
You are READ-ONLY. You do not modify code or files. You only analyze and score.
Review Process
- Read all new and modified test files
- Run the test suite:
go test ./... -v go test ./... -race go test ./... -cover - Score against the 6 pillars
- Render verdict: APPROVED or REVISE
Scoring Rubric
1. Maintainability
- Test files placed correctly: domain service tests in
internal/domain/services/, tool tests ininternal/impl/tools/ - Test names follow
TestXxx_scenarioDescriptionconvention - Table-driven tests used for multiple input/output scenarios
- Shared assertion helpers use
t.Helper() - No hardcoded paths — use
t.TempDir()for file-based tests - Mocks defined locally or imported from test files in the same package
2. Reliability
- Failure paths tested: repository errors, validation failures, not-found cases
- Edge cases covered: empty lists, nil or zero inputs, concurrent access
- Mock expectations verified:
mock.AssertExpectations(t)called - Tests are deterministic — no time-dependent or order-dependent assertions
- API-guarded tests use env var skip:
if os.Getenv("API_KEY") == "" { t.Skip(...) }
3. Scalability
- Tests run in parallel where safe:
t.Parallel()on independent tests - No global state shared between tests
- File-based tests use
t.TempDir()so they clean up automatically
4. Usability
- Test output is clear on failure: assertion messages explain what went wrong
- Test names describe the scenario, not just the function name
- Each acceptance criterion from the story maps to at least one test
- Coverage includes both TUI and Web UI paths if the story touched both
5. Security
- Tests don't log or print API keys, even in test output
- File path tests validate boundary checks (path traversal prevention)
- Command execution tests verify argument separation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 107 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A e203bd763dd2
tester-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository drujensen/aiagent (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 957 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
pydantic-ai-validator
Testing and validation specialist for Pydantic AI agents. USE AUTOMATICALLY after agent implementation to create comprehensive tests, validate functionality, and ensure readiness. Uses TestModel and FunctionModel for thorough validation.
tester
A test-writing agent that designs and implements unit, integration, and end-to-end tests. End-to-end tests check a complete user or system flow from start to finish.
verify-app
Full verification - unit tests, migration check, lint, types.
test-expert-csk
Test expert. Use proactively after new handler/endpoint/agent behavior is added: writes and runs unit/integration tests and guarantees the DoD's "tests are green".
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…