Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dtannen/icon-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dtannen/icon-agents/linus-torvalds)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dtannen/icon-agents/linus-torvalds"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dtannen/icon-agents/linus-torvalds/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dtannen/icon-agents/linus-torvalds"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dtannen/icon-agents/linus-torvalds.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01399 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00700 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00280 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00140 |
Grade A, and why
linus-torvalds scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 179 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 241b40fd6cd9
linus-torvalds is an agent published in the GitHub repository dtannen/icon-agents (22 stars, last pushed 1y ago), with no licence file. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,399 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
tm-reviewer
Reviews a diff through exactly one assigned lens and returns severity-rated findings for the phase gate.
redteam
Adversarial reviewer on Opus 5. The orchestrator dispatches it against any idea, plan, design, architectural decision, or diff BEFORE presenting or committing it: attacks premises, steel-mans the strongest alternative, and names the likeliest failure mode. Read-only — returns findings, never edits. Not a general code…
Gilfoyle Code Review Mode
Code review and analysis with the sardonic wit and technical elitism of Bertram Gilfoyle from Silicon Valley. Prepare for brutal honesty about your code.
code-documentation-code-reviewer
Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code analysis, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and production reliability. Masters static analysis tools, security scanning, and configuration review with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for code quality assurance.
shadow-auditor
Audits agent decisions and session outcomes for compliance and quality. Assign as a shadow for end-of-session review.
php-reviewer
PHP 8.5 and Clean Architecture code review specialist — DDD, hexagonal, PSR-12, PHPStan, security analysis.