Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/duc01226/easyplatform/e2e-runnergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/duc01226/easyplatform/e2e-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/duc01226/easyplatform/e2e-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/duc01226/easyplatform/e2e-runner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.08000 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.04000 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01600 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00800 |
Grade A, and why
e2e-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 447 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quick Summary
Goal: Generate and maintain E2E tests on the project's auto-detected framework with mandatory TC-code↔test traceability, producing a suite that runs, repeats deterministically, and provably maps every test back to its spec.
Summary:
- Read the project E2E reference + config FIRST — detect the framework (Playwright/Cypress/Selenium) before writing anything.
- Every test carries a
TC-{MODULE}-E2E-{NNN}code — traceability back to the spec is mandatory. - Use Page Object Model; derive stable selectors from
data-testid/BEM/ARIA, never positional/generated ones; keep assertions out of page objects. - Deterministic runs — unique GUID test data, explicit waits only, reused auth session; after fixing failures, record the learning back in the E2E reference doc.
Workflow:
- Read project E2E docs —
docs/project-reference/e2e-test-reference.md,docs/project-config.json - Detect framework — Playwright, Cypress, Selenium, etc.
- Load test specs — find TC codes in feature docs
- Generate/update tests — follow Page Object pattern
- Run tests — project's configured commands
- Update docs — add learnings to
docs/project-reference/e2e-test-reference.md
Key Rules:
- NEVER fabricate file paths, function names, or behavior — investigate first, then act — why: a hallucinated selector or path passes review and fails only at runtime
- MUST ATTENTION include TC code (
TC-{MODULE}-E2E-{NNN}) in every test — why: traceability is how a test proves which spec it covers - NEVER hardcode brittle selectors — derive stable ones from
data-testid, BEM classes, or ARIA roles — why: generated/positional selectors break on every unrelated markup change - ALWAYS update visual baselines when UI changes — why: stale baselines turn real regressions into false failures
- MUST ATTENTION read the project E2E reference BEFORE any E2E work — why: local conventions override generic framework defaults
Evidence Gate — Every claim, finding, and recommendation requires
file:lineproof or traced evidence. Confidence >80% to act; <80% must verify first. NEVER speculate without proof. External Memory — For complex or lengthy work (research, analysis, scan, review), write intermediate findings and final results to a report file inplans/reports/— prevents context loss.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 447 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A fe3430b59d17
e2e-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository duc01226/EasyPlatform (9 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 8,000 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
qa
Use when testing application quality via browser dogfood, E2E tests, or API smoke tests. Navigates the app with the available browser tool, takes screenshots, checks console errors, and runs relevant E2E tests. Read-only — reports issues but never edits code. Also use when the user says 'test this', 'dogfood', 'QA'…
e2e-verifier
FlutterアプリのE2E動作検証エージェント。MCP(dart-mcp + Marionette)を使い、シミュレーター上でUI操作・検証を行う。mobile-automationスキルから呼び出される。.
test-reporter
Agent "test-reporter" from nrslib/takt, covering e2e test reporter and instructions.
integration-testing-orchestrator
Use this agent when you need to coordinate end-to-end testing across multiple components, optimize build systems, validate deployments, or ensure proper integration between eBPF programs, Rust collector, and frontend components. Examples: Context: User has made changes to both eBPF programs and Rust collector and…
electron-e2e-test-runner
Use this agent when you need to run, debug, or troubleshoot end-to-end Electron tests. This includes handling test execution, interpreting test results, and resolving common Electron testing issues like process launch failures, test timeouts, or environment setup problems. Examples:\n\n \nContext: The user is working…
Testing Agent
Ensures quality through comprehensive testing strategies, test automation, and quality assurance processes.