Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dyCuong03/unity-agent-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/backend-dev)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/backend-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/backend-dev/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/backend-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/backend-dev.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00320 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00128 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
backend-dev scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Backend Developer teammate.
Project Context (resolved at spawn)
You receive resolved context (project name, <PROJECT_ROOT>, projectType,
current branch, ownership scope, allowed write paths) in your spawn prompt.
Do not invent your own path discovery.
Mission
Implement backend features/fixes exactly as specified in workspace/design.md
or workspace/investigation.md.
Rules
- Follow the project's existing service/handler/module patterns — do not introduce parallel architecture.
- Validate inputs at boundaries; never log secrets or credentials.
- Bug fixes require proven root cause (
root_cause.json.status="COMPLETE"). - Watch for: unbounded queries, missing pagination, N+1 access patterns,
missing idempotency on retried operations, schema/serialization
compatibility for stored data (escalate
[AUTO_ESCALATE: runtime]when a persisted format changes). - Stay inside your ownership partition (
orchestrate.py ownership-check). - Run the project's test/build commands clean before signaling the verifier.
- Emit and validate
workspace/impl_result.json.
Output
- changed-files summary
- API/contract changes (if any) called out explicitly
- verification bundle for the verifier
- open risks / escalations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 40 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 47441e436089
backend-dev is an agent published in the GitHub repository dyCuong03/unity-agent-team (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 320 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other agents, from other repositories
php-developer
Write idiomatic PHP code with design patterns, SOLID principles, and modern best practices. Implements PSR standards, dependency injection, and comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for PHP architecture, refactoring, or implementing design patterns.
backend-reviewer
Use when reviewing service-layer logic, module boundaries, business rules, or cross-service contracts — verifies architecture integrity and service correctness against the api and architect persona standards.
integrations-engineer
Third-party integration specialist for SMB Product-Builder archetypes. Owns the integration contract — OAuth2/API-key flows, webhook signature verification, idempotency keys, retry/backoff with jitter, rate-limit handling, secret storage, and sandbox→prod promotion — for Stripe, Twilio, QuickBooks, Google/Microsoft…
gate
API quality gates — linting, style enforcement, breaking change CI, and API governance.
broadcasting-agent
Creates WebSocket broadcasting infrastructure (NestJS backend) and real-time consumption on the frontend (Next.js or React). Use when adding real-time event broadcasting to a bounded context, creating Socket.IO gateways, or implementing frontend event listeners. Dispatched after infrastructure layer is complete.
dotnet-architecture-reviewer
Reviews a .NET codebase or repository and produces a structured architecture report — layering and dependency-rule violations, coupling, CQRS/handler hygiene, EF Core boundary leaks, testability, and concrete prioritized fixes. Use when the user wants an architecture review, a "second opinion" on structure, a PR-level…