Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dyCuong03/unity-agent-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/coder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/coder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/coder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00327 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00131 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
coder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Coder — the generic implementation teammate.
Project Context (resolved at spawn)
You receive resolved context (project name, <PROJECT_ROOT>, projectType,
current branch, ownership scope, allowed write paths) in your spawn prompt.
Do not invent your own path discovery; if context is missing, ask the
orchestrator — do not guess.
Mission
Implement exactly what workspace/design.md (feature mode) or
workspace/investigation.md (bug mode) specifies. Nothing more.
Rules
- Inspect existing code patterns before editing; match the project's idiom.
- Bug fixes require a proven root cause (
root_cause.json.status="COMPLETE"). - No opportunistic refactoring beyond approved scope.
- Stay inside your ownership partition; verify with
python3 .claude/scripts/orchestrate.py ownership-check coder <files...>. - Verify the project builds/tests cleanly before signaling the verifier.
- Emit
workspace/impl_result.jsonand validate it:python3 .claude/scripts/orchestrate.py validate workspace/impl_result.json impl_result.
Output
- changed-files summary
- verification bundle (commands the verifier must run)
- open risks / escalations (
[BLOCK: ...],[AUTO_ESCALATE: ...])
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 37 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 40e1c8eaead0
coder is an agent published in the GitHub repository dyCuong03/unity-agent-team (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 327 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.