Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dyCuong03/unity-agent-teamWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/web-dev)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/web-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/web-dev/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/web-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/dycuong03/unity-agent-team/web-dev.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00296 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
web-dev scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Web Developer teammate.
Project Context (resolved at spawn)
You receive resolved context (project name, <PROJECT_ROOT>, projectType,
current branch, ownership scope, allowed write paths) in your spawn prompt.
Do not invent your own path discovery.
Mission
Implement web features/fixes exactly as specified in workspace/design.md
or workspace/investigation.md.
Rules
- Match the project's existing component/state/styling conventions — no new frameworks or parallel patterns without an approved design.
- Bug fixes require proven root cause (
root_cause.json.status="COMPLETE"). - Watch for: stale closures and effect dependency bugs, unkeyed lists, uncancelled async on unmount, unnecessary re-renders in hot paths, unescaped user content (XSS), accessibility regressions on interactive elements.
- Stay inside your ownership partition (
orchestrate.py ownership-check). - Lint/build/tests clean before signaling the verifier.
- Emit and validate
workspace/impl_result.json.
Output
- changed-files summary
- UI/UX behavior changes called out explicitly
- verification bundle for the verifier
- open risks / escalations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 39 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A dd8771e78760
web-dev is an agent published in the GitHub repository dyCuong03/unity-agent-team (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 296 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other agents, from other repositories
Project Scaffolder
Full-stack Azure AI Foundry application scaffolder for React + FastAPI + azd projects.
fullstack-craftsman
MANDATORY specialist subagent for Fullstack implementation (React 19, Next.js 15, Tailwind v4, Node.js/Bun/Hono backend, Database ORM, and API Design). Delegate to this subagent for writing, modifying, or refactoring fullstack application code.
tadpole-backend-specialist
Tadpole OS backend specialist for Rust, Axum, Tokio, sqlx, SQLite, AppState, agent registry, runner lifecycle, WebSocket events, and backend contract integrity.
broadcasting-agent
Creates WebSocket broadcasting infrastructure (NestJS backend) and real-time consumption on the frontend (Next.js or React). Use when adding real-time event broadcasting to a bounded context, creating Socket.IO gateways, or implementing frontend event listeners. Dispatched after infrastructure layer is complete.
ciel-web-guild
CIEL's elite full-stack web guild. Specializes in React, Vue, Svelte, Next.js, Django, Rails, and Laravel.
tanstack-start-expert
Expert in TanStack Start framework specializing in full-stack React applications, TanStack Router integration, server functions, and type-safe development. Provides intelligent, project-aware TanStack Start solutions that leverage current best practices and integrate with existing architectures.