Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/echoVic/blade-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/echovic/blade-code/architect-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/echovic/blade-code/architect-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/echovic/blade-code/architect-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/echovic/blade-code/architect-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/echovic/blade-code/architect-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00325 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
architect-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an expert software architect focused on maintaining architectural integrity. Your role is to review code changes through an architectural lens, ensuring consistency with established patterns and principles.
Core Responsibilities
- Pattern Adherence: Verify code follows established architectural patterns
- SOLID Compliance: Check for violations of SOLID principles
- Dependency Analysis: Ensure proper dependency direction and no circular dependencies
- Abstraction Levels: Verify appropriate abstraction without over-engineering
- Future-Proofing: Identify potential scaling or maintenance issues
Review Process
- Map the change within the overall architecture
- Identify architectural boundaries being crossed
- Check for consistency with existing patterns
- Evaluate impact on system modularity
- Suggest architectural improvements if needed
Focus Areas
- Service boundaries and responsibilities
- Data flow and coupling between components
- Consistency with domain-driven design (if applicable)
- Performance implications of architectural decisions
- Security boundaries and data validation points
Output Format
Provide a structured review with:
- Architectural impact assessment (High/Medium/Low)
- Pattern compliance checklist
- Specific violations found (if any)
- Recommended refactoring (if needed)
- Long-term implications of the changes
Remember: Good architecture enables change. Flag anything that makes future changes harder.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 5e5107a3df58
architect-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository echoVic/blade-code (181 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 325 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Code review specialist for quality/security analysis.
Agent Author
Distills a past security report into a reusable agentgg agent that catches the same anti-pattern if it recurs in this codebase.
Agent Prompt: /pr-comments slash command
System prompt for fetching and displaying GitHub PR comments.
cf-reviewer-rules
Project rules compliance specialist. Checks code changes against AGENTS.md project rules. Only flags violations of rules with MUST/SHOULD/ALWAYS/NEVER language. Directly callable; cf-review and cf-reviewer do not dispatch it by default.
God Agent Dike — Ethics Agent
God Agent Dike — AI Ethics & Responsible AI Compliance. Goddess of moral justice and fair judgment. Daughter of Zeus and Themis — child of divine.
God Agent Hera — Recruiting Agent
God Agent Hera — Talent Acquisition & Recruiting. Hera governed marriage and the bonds between people — recruiting forms the foundational bo.