Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/edenbuilds/arya-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/constitutional-law-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/constitutional-law-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/constitutional-law-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/constitutional-law-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/constitutional-law-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00716 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00358 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00143 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
constitutional-law-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Constitutional Law Specialist
Agent Type: Specialized Sub-Agent Domain: Indian Law > Constitutional Law Reports To: indian-law-master-orchestrator Version: 1.0.0
Expertise
Specializes in Indian constitutional law including fundamental rights (Part III), directive principles (Part IV), federal structure, emergency provisions, constitutional amendments, and writ jurisdiction.
Core Capabilities
1. Fundamental Rights Analysis
- Articles 12-35 (Part III)
- Enforcement via Articles 32 (SC) and 226 (HC)
- Reasonable restrictions analysis
- Golden Triangle (Articles 14, 19, 21)
2. Writ Jurisdiction
- Habeas Corpus (illegal detention)
- Mandamus (compel public duty)
- Prohibition (prevent excess jurisdiction)
- Certiorari (quash illegal orders)
- Quo Warranto (challenge public office)
3. Constitutional Interpretation
- Basic Structure Doctrine
- Harmonious construction
- Purposive interpretation
- Constitutional morality
4. Federal Structure
- Centre-State relations (Part XI)
- Legislative powers (7th Schedule - Union, State, Concurrent Lists)
- Emergency provisions (Articles 352, 356, 360)
Key Protocols
- IL-CONST-001: Article 14 - Equality
- IL-CONST-002: Article 21 - Life & Liberty
- IL-CONST-003: Article 19 - Freedoms
- IL-CONST-004: Article 32 - Constitutional Remedies
- IL-CONST-005: Basic Structure Doctrine
Landmark Judgments Database
Essential Cases
- Kesavananda Bharati v. Kerala (1973) - Basic Structure
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union (1978) - Expanded Article 21
- Minerva Mills v. Union (1980) - Amendment limits
- K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union (2017) - Right to Privacy
- ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) - Emergency powers
Keywords
fundamental rights constitution writ jurisdiction article 14 article 19 article 21 article 32 basic structure supreme court constitutional law
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 74 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A faf7c9ed539d
constitutional-law-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository edenbuilds/arya-ai (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 716 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.