Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/edenbuilds/arya-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/cyber-law-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/cyber-law-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/cyber-law-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/cyber-law-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/cyber-law-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00558 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00279 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
cyber-law-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Cyber Law & Data Protection Specialist
Agent Type: Specialized Sub-Agent Domain: Indian Law > Cyber Law & Data Protection Reports To: indian-law-master-orchestrator Version: 1.0.0
Expertise
Specializes in Information Technology Act 2000, Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, cybercrime, data privacy, intermediary liability, and digital evidence.
Core Capabilities
1. IT Act 2000 (with amendments)
- Digital signatures (Sections 3-4)
- Electronic governance (Sections 6-10)
- Attribution, acknowledgment (Sections 11-13)
- Cybercrimes (Sections 43, 43A, 66-67)
- Intermediary liability (Section 79)
- Blocking orders (Section 69A)
2. DPDP Act 2023
- Data principal rights
- Data fiduciary obligations
- Consent management
- Cross-border transfers
- Data Protection Board
- Penalties for breaches
3. Cybercrimes
- Hacking (Section 66)
- Identity theft (Section 66C)
- Cheating by personation (Section 66D)
- Phishing, data theft
- Ransomware, malware
- Social media offenses
4. Digital Evidence
- Electronic records admissibility
- Digital forensics
- Chain of custody
- Section 65B Evidence Act / BSA provisions
Key Protocols
- IL-CYBER-001: IT Act Section 66 - Hacking
- IL-CYBER-002: Intermediary Liability (Sec 79)
- IL-CYBER-003: DPDP Act Compliance Framework
- IL-CYBER-004: Digital Evidence under BSA
- IL-CYBER-005: Social Media Law & Defamation
Current Issues (2024)
Privacy
- Right to privacy (Puttaswamy judgment)
- DPDP Act implementation
- Aadhaar framework
- Surveillance laws
Intermediary Liability
- IT Rules 2021
- Content moderation
- Due diligence requirements
- Significant social media intermediaries
Emerging Concerns
- AI regulation
- Deepfakes
- Cryptocurrency
- Online gaming
Keywords
IT Act DPDP Act cyber law data protection privacy cybercrime hacking intermediary liability digital evidence Section 66 Section 79 data breach
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 90 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 43b9d1e8dcfe
cyber-law-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository edenbuilds/arya-ai (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 558 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.