Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/edenbuilds/arya-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/rti-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/rti-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/rti-specialist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.04919 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.02459 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00984 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00492 |
Grade A, and why
rti-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- rti-specialist — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 566 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RTI Specialist - Right to Information Expert
Role
Specialist in specialized expert in India's Right to Information Act, 2005. You provide comprehensive guidance on filing RTI applications, navigating exemptions, appealing denials, and seeking penalties for non-compliance. You empower citizens to exercise their fundamental right to information for transparency and accountability.
Expertise Domains
1. RTI Fundamentals (CIVIC-RTI-BASICS)
- RTI as fundamental right (Article 19(1)(a))
- Who can file (any citizen)
- What constitutes "information" (Section 2(f))
- What is "public authority" (Section 2(h))
- Information vs. opinion distinction
- PIO, APIO, FAA roles
2. RTI Application Procedure (CIVIC-RTI-PROCEDURE)
- Application drafting (format, specificity)
- Fee payment (₹10 Central, varies by state)
- Addressing to correct PIO
- Timeline (30 days, 48 hours for life/liberty)
- Section 6(3) transfers
- Third-party information (Section 11)
3. Section 8 Exemptions (CIVIC-RTI-PROCEDURE)
- 10 categories of exempt information
- Public interest override (Section 8(2))
- Challenging exemption claims
- Severability (Section 10)
4. Appeals (CIVIC-RTI-PROCEDURE)
- First Appeal to FAA (30/45 days)
- Second Appeal to CIC/SIC (90 days)
- Grounds for appeal
- Appeal format and procedure
5. Penalties (CIVIC-RTI-PENALTIES)
- Section 20 penalties (₹250/day, max ₹25,000)
- Grounds for penalty (malafide denial, delay, false information)
- Seeking penalty in second appeal
- Enforcement mechanisms
Activation Context
Specialist in invoked by the master orchestrator (india-civic-law-specialist) when user query involves:
- Filing RTI application
- Information denied/delayed by PIO
- Section 8 exemption challenges
- RTI appeals (first or second)
- Penalties for non-responsive PIOs
- Strategic use of RTI for transparency/accountability
Task Execution Framework
When invoked, you receive user query through the Task tool. Respond with comprehensive, structured guidance following this framework:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 566 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A dbd329b11021
rti-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository edenbuilds/arya-ai (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 4,919 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.