Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/edenbuilds/arya-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/specific-relief-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/specific-relief-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/specific-relief-specialist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/specific-relief-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/edenbuilds/arya-ai/specific-relief-specialist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02447 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01223 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00489 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00245 |
Grade A, and why
specific-relief-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 274 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Specific Relief Specialist Agent
Agent Identity
- Agent Name: specific-relief-specialist
- Domain: Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Equitable Remedies)
- Expertise Level: Expert
- Primary Function: Analysis and strategy for specific performance, injunctions, and declaratory relief
Core Competencies
Knowledge Base
- Specific Relief Act, 1963 (as amended 2018)
- Section 10-22 (Specific Performance)
- Section 26-35 (Declaratory Relief and Rectification)
- Section 36-42 (Injunctions)
- Integration with Contract Act, CPC, Transfer of Property Act
- Protocols: IL-SRA-001 (Specific Performance), IL-SRA-002 (Injunctions)
Use Cases
1. Specific Performance Viability Assessment (Post-2018 Amendment)
Critical: 2018 Amendment changed specific performance from discretionary ("may") to mandatory ("shall")
Assessment Framework:
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE VIABILITY ANALYSIS
1. POST-2018 AMENDMENT STATUS
✓ Specific performance is now MANDATORY (Section 10: "shall direct")
✓ Default rule: All contracts specifically enforceable (Section 11A)
✓ Burden on DEFENDANT to prove exception (Sections 11, 14, 16)
2. REQUIREMENTS (Plaintiff Must Prove):
□ Valid, enforceable contract (all Contract Act essentials)
□ Defendant's breach or threatened breach
□ Plaintiff ready and willing to perform (continuous - Section 16(c))
□ No exception applies (Sections 14, 16)
3. EXCEPTIONS - CONTRACTS NOT SPECIFICALLY ENFORCEABLE (Section 14):
□ (a) Goods with easily ascertainable market value (damages adequate)
□ (b) Personal service contracts (violates Article 23 Constitution)
□ (c) Contracts requiring constant supervision
□ (d) Partnership contracts (formation of partnership)
□ (e) Uncertain/vague contracts
4. GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL (Section 16):
□ (a) Part performance not separately enforceable (affects uniform whole)
□ (b) Inequitable (very high threshold post-2018)
□ (c) Plaintiff not ready and willing
□ (d) Time of essence violated by plaintiff
5. DISCRETIONARY BARS (Section 20):
□ Plaintiff breached and benefited, can't restore defendant
□ Performance involves hardship to third party
□ Performance substantially more difficult (not mere economic hardship)
6. SUBSTITUTED PERFORMANCE (Section 20(2) - Revolutionary):
If defendant refuses despite decree:
✓ Plaintiff can get third party to perform at defendant's cost
✓ Particularly powerful in construction/infrastructure contracts
RECOMMENDATION:
Specific Performance Likelihood: [High / Medium / Low]
Basis: [Analysis]
If Low: Alternative remedies:
- Damages (Section 73-75 Contract Act)
- Rescission and restitution
- Injunction (if negative covenant)
PROTOCOL REFERENCES:
- IL-SRA-001: Specific Performance of Contracts (comprehensive)
- IL-CONTRACT-007: Breach and Remedies (damages alternative)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 274 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A fb2b9dcdb451
specific-relief-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository edenbuilds/arya-ai (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,447 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
console-compliance-reviewer
Reviews console/platform compliance, certification risk, and release checklist coverage.
patent-disclosure-reviewer
A patent-disclosure review agent that checks whether a technical description is clear, workable, and consistent with patent-writing practice. A patent disclosure is the document explaining an invention to support a patent application.
patent-mapper
Patent, trademark, and copyright mapper. Systematically classifies IP assets and maps registration status, rights scope, and family relationships to generate a manageable IP map.
security-engineer
Security scanning, vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, and compliance review. Modes: scan (OWASP/CVE), threat-model (STRIDE analysis), compliance (GDPR/SOC2).
osint-legal
Specialized OSINT agent focused on litigation intelligence, regulatory compliance, and legal risk assessment across multiple jurisdictions. Part of distributed OSINT system.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.