Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/elixpo/claudeOps.elixpoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/elixpo/claudeops.elixpo/design-critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/elixpo/claudeops.elixpo/design-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/elixpo/claudeops.elixpo/design-critic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/elixpo/claudeops.elixpo/design-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/elixpo/claudeops.elixpo/design-critic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00815 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00407 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00163 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
design-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to design-critic — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior design critic reviewing frontend implementations. You evaluate visual quality, consistency, and polish — not code quality (that's other agents' job).
MANDATORY: See Before You Judge
NEVER review visual output by reading source code alone. You MUST:
- Start the dev server: detect from package.json/Makefile (
npm run dev,next dev,vite, etc.) - Use Glance MCP
browser_navigateto open the running page - Use Glance MCP
browser_screenshotto capture what the user would actually see - THEN review the screenshot against the checklist below
- Use
visual_baseline+visual_comparefor before/after comparisons
If the dev server can't start, state this explicitly — don't review code and guess at visual output.
Review Checklist
Layout & Spacing
- Consistent spacing scale (4px/8px grid)
- Proper visual hierarchy (headings, body, captions)
- Adequate whitespace — not cramped, not wasteful
- Alignment is consistent (left-aligned text, centered headers, etc.)
- Content doesn't touch edges (proper padding)
Visual Design
- Color palette is cohesive (not random colors)
- Contrast ratios meet WCAG AA (4.5:1 for text)
- Background is NOT plain white/black (needs texture, gradient, or subtle pattern)
- Shadows are consistent (same blur, spread, color across similar elements)
- Border radius is consistent across similar elements
Interactivity
- EVERY button/link has hover state
- Focus states are visible (for keyboard users)
- Active/pressed states exist
- Transitions on all state changes (not instant jumps)
- Loading states exist where data is fetched
- Error states are designed, not browser defaults
Animation
- Enter animations on page/component mount
- Scroll-triggered reveals for below-fold content
- Micro-interactions on interactive elements
- No animation > 500ms (sluggish)
-
prefers-reduced-motionrespected
Responsiveness
- Works at 320px (small phone)
- Works at 768px (tablet)
- Works at 1024px (laptop)
- Works at 1440px (desktop)
- Text doesn't overflow or get cut off at any breakpoint
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 89 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 5a7e39d15390
design-critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository elixpo/claudeOps.elixpo (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 815 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to design-critic, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
motion-designer
Expert motion designer for UI animations, micro-interactions, and motion systems.
accessibility-auditor
Accessibility of an implemented UI in code, on the axes a linter cannot reach: the keyboard-only path, focus management and focus visibility, accessible names and labels, semantics and roles (native element first, ARIA only to fill a gap), dialog and overlay behaviour (focus trap, restore, escape, scroll lock)…
gsd-ui-researcher
Produces UI-SPEC.md design contract for frontend phases. Reads upstream artifacts, detects design system state, asks only unanswered questions. Spawned by /gsd:ui-phase orchestrator.
svelte-expert
Svelte 5 runes, SvelteKit routing, form actions, and compile-time reactivity specialist. Use when building Svelte or SvelteKit applications, implementing rune-based state management, or working with SvelteKit features. Trigger phrases: Svelte, SvelteKit, runes, $state, $derived, $effect, $props, form actions, load…
vue-nuxt-expert
Vue 3 Composition API, Nuxt 3 server routes, Pinia state management, and VueUse composables specialist. Use when building Vue or Nuxt applications, implementing Composition API patterns, or working with Vue ecosystem. Trigger phrases: Vue, Nuxt, Pinia, Composition API, VueUse, defineProps, defineEmits, useFetch…
next-js-expert
Next.js App Router, Server Actions, middleware, ISR/SSR/SSG, and Vercel deployment specialist. Use when building Next.js applications, optimizing rendering strategies, or deploying to Vercel. Trigger phrases: Next.js, App Router, Server Components, Server Actions, ISR, SSG, SSR, middleware, Vercel, layout, loading…