Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Elnora-AI/elnora-merit-aktivaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/elnora-ai/elnora-merit-aktiva/merit-company-lookup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/elnora-ai/elnora-merit-aktiva/merit-company-lookup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/elnora-ai/elnora-merit-aktiva/merit-company-lookup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/elnora-ai/elnora-merit-aktiva/merit-company-lookup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/elnora-ai/elnora-merit-aktiva/merit-company-lookup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00198 | $0.00741 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00099 | $0.00370 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00040 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
merit-company-lookup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Merit Company Lookup (äriregister free services)
Pull live data from the Estonian Business Register via elnora-merit ariregister. These are
the two FREE (tasuta) services — read-only, no cost, safe to call.
Capabilities
-
Requisites —
elnora-merit ariregister requisites <regCode>Returns legal name, VAT number (kmkr_nr), status (R = registered/active), full address, and the registry link. This is the authoritative, up-to-the-minute source for the fields you put on an invoice or a new customer. Requires äriregister XML credentials. Optional:--include-deleted,--lang eng. -
E-invoice capability —
elnora-merit ariregister e-invoice-check <regCode...>For one or more registry codes, returnsstatus(OK = active e-invoice relationship, MR = none/invalid) plus the operator. Needs NO credentials. Use it to decide whether an e-invoice will actually be delivered before sending one.
Steps
- Get the registry code (registrikood, 8 digits). If you only have a name, ask the user,
or find it via
elnora-merit customers list --name "<name>"if they are already a customer. - Run the relevant command. Both accept the code(s) as positional arguments.
- Report the result plainly. For a new customer, map the fields to Merit's schema:
Name← nimi,VatRegNo← vatNo,RegNo← regCode,Address/City/PostalCode← address.
Rules
- Only the two free services are wired. Detailed data, beneficial owners, and representation rights are billable and are NOT available here — do not attempt them.
- Requisites needs
ARIREG_XML_USER/ARIREG_XML_PASSWORD(a "credential rejected" error means they are missing or wrong). E-invoice-check works without them. - These are lookups, not writes — nothing here changes the books. Reporting the data is enough.
- A
statusother thanR(e.g.K= deleted) means the company is not active — flag it before invoicing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 57 lines · 198 tokens per session scan A 672d25f80461
merit-company-lookup is an agent published in the GitHub repository Elnora-AI/elnora-merit-aktiva (8 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 198 tokens to every session and 741 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
compliance
Project standards expert for CLAUDE.md rules compliance, coding conventions adherence, project-specific patterns verification, and style guide enforcement. Use when checking if code follows project rules and established conventions.
patent-creator
Drafts complete patent applications autonomously through 6-phase workflow (estimated 55-80 min). Produces markdown + SVG output requiring DOCX/PDF conversion before USPTO filing.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
adtech-privacy-reviewer
US adtech / web-tracking privacy-litigation pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-adtech-{slug}.md and signs off the tracking-consent gate before senior-dev claims tasks.
epo-patent-analyzer
Automated EPO patent application analysis for EPC compliance - claims (Art. 84 EPC), sufficiency (Art. 83 EPC), and formalities (Rules 42-49 EPC).
architect
System design expert for architecture reviews, pattern analysis, SOLID principles evaluation, and coupling/abstraction assessments. Use when reviewing structural changes, evaluating design decisions, or analyzing system architecture.