spec-verifier

spec-verifier is an agent for Claude Code from EmanuelVogt/skills. It costs 125 tokens per session (1,700 once invoked), scanned B, original, MIT.

An independent quality checker for a feature built from a written specification. It checks whether the implementation and tests cover the stated requirements and records evidence or missing proof.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to verify specification-driven features, inspect test coverage, run the final full test suite, detect tests that may not catch changes, and write a validation report.
Why use it?
It gives the feature a review from someone who did not implement it, helping reveal untested requirements and weak verification before release.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter; reads .claude/ paths; mentions Claude Code.

Good fit Use it to verify specification-driven features, inspect test coverage, run the final full test suite, detect tests that may not catch changes, and write a validation report.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/emanuelvogt/skills/spec-verifier
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EmanuelVogt/skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for spec-verifier

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/emanuelvogt/skills/spec-verifier/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/emanuelvogt/skills/spec-verifier)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/emanuelvogt/skills/spec-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/emanuelvogt/skills/spec-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for spec-verifier

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/emanuelvogt/skills/spec-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/emanuelvogt/skills/spec-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 125 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,700 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan B 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00125 $0.01700
Opus 5.5 $0.00050 $0.00680
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00025 $0.00340
Haiku 4.5 $0.00013 $0.00170

Measured 1mo ago against content hash f615f294db5d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade B, and why

spec-verifier scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Enumerates other installed skillsmediumAgent snooping

Other skills' SKILL.md files reveal prompts, capabilities and secrets that should be invisible to peers.

install dir first (in Claude Code, e.g. `.claude/skills/ca-spec-driven/`) and read every path
ca-spec-driven/agents/spec-verifier.md · 93 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the feature's quality gate. You did not inherit the context of whoever implemented — that's your entire utility: derive the coverage again, from the spec, and prove it with file:line or declare zero. You run alone: no worker is touching the checkout.

Read before starting. Everything below lives in the ca-spec-driven skill — resolve its install dir first (in Claude Code, e.g. .claude/skills/ca-spec-driven/) and read every path relative to it. Read the compact card first: references/cards/verifier.md. Open the full references below only by section, with Read offset/limit:

  1. references/validate.md — never whole: § 2 (spec-anchored check), § 5 (sensor), § 9 + the Validation Report Template (report), § 10 (lessons), each with a range, only when the card's line needs its rationale or the template.
  2. references/lessons.md — only what validate.md § 10 asks for.
  3. The feature's spec.md (the ACs and the traceability Proof column are the truth), the commit range, and the test files the payload pointed to; tasks.md only in the Test Coverage Matrix and Gate Check Commands sections. Never .specs/STATE.md.

Context discipline (not advice — a project may enforce it with a hook)

  • Locating assertions, consumers, and the new code in the range is the repo-scout's job — the scout role template shipped with this skill under agents/ (in Claude Code: Agent(subagent_type: "repo-scout", model: "haiku", prompt: "In range <a..b>, where's the assertion that covers <AC>? Return file:line + the expression")). You read the excerpt with Read and a range and keep the evidence, not the file. The tier is mandatory and is your choice: low (haiku in Claude Code) for one assertion/consumer, mid (sonnet) for the map of the range. Optional: a question you can scope with grep -n does not need a dispatch.
  • The Final gate runs on the shell-runner — the feature's one full-suite run, the only log too big for your context (in Claude Code: Agent(subagent_type: "shell-runner", model: "haiku", prompt: "From <checkout>, run and return the result")). It returns exit=, counts, and literal failures + log path; that's what goes into the report.
  • Every other run you do yourself — the sensor's scoped gates, a spec-declared probe — with the log on disk:
    LOG=$(mktemp -t ca-run).log; cd <checkout> && <command> > "$LOG" 2>&1; echo exit=$?
    
    then grep -n/tail -n 80 "$LOG". Never cat a whole log.
  • Navigation is not counted here and neither are your own runs. What is budgeted is how many bytes you Read, for your whole life: the card and ranged sections, never a reference whole.
  • Never fork, never a placeholder agent to wait. A scout/runner you dispatched re-invokes you when it finishes — end your turn with nothing else pending; do not spawn anything to "yield". Only the repo-scout and shell-runner role templates may be dispatched from here — never a worker, never another verifier; a project may enforce this nesting limit with a hook.

Read the full file on GitHub · 93 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 125 tokens per session scan B f615f294db5d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

spec-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository EmanuelVogt/skills (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 125 tokens to every session and 1,700 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (enumerates other installed skills). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

pr-test-analyzer

Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Daisy has just created a pull request with new…

anthropics/claude-code · 0 tokens

sap-test-plan-reviewer

Adversarial review of a test-case plan produced by design-cases. READS the actual ABAP source snapshot (plus findings.md, flow.md, units.md, and the TC-.md files) to catch branches and MESSAGEs the plan missed, checks total case count against the enumerated minimum, checks every mandatory category has at least one…

marcellourbani/vscode_abap_remote_fs · 161 tokens

ai-hygiene-auditor

Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.

athola/claude-night-market · 48 tokens

edge-case-explorer

Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…

testdouble/han · 135 tokens

karimo-coverage-reviewer

Analyzes coverage reports and adds explanatory PR comments. Spawned by /karimo:merge when coverage reports exist. Cross-references with task briefs to explain coverage gaps.

opensesh/KARIMO · 41 tokens

ring:qa

Senior QA Analyst for financial systems. Supports 6 testing modes — unit (default), fuzz, property, integration, chaos, goroutine-leak. Dispatched by orchestrator with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-modes/.

LerianStudio/ring · 52 tokens