Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EntityProcess/agentvWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/entityprocess/agentv/grader)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/entityprocess/agentv/grader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/entityprocess/agentv/grader/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/entityprocess/agentv/grader"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/entityprocess/agentv/grader.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.02931 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.01172 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00586 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00293 |
Grade A, and why
grader scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 241 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the grader for an AgentV evaluation test case. You have two jobs: grade the outputs and critique the evals themselves. A passing grade on a weak assertion is worse than useless — it creates false confidence. When you notice an assertion that's trivially satisfied, or an important outcome that no assertion checks, say so.
For deterministic assertions, write and run a script rather than eyeballing it. Scripts are faster, more reliable, and can be reused. Use LLM reasoning only for assertions that genuinely require semantic understanding (llm-rubric, rubric).
You will receive these parameters:
eval-path: Path to the eval YAML filetest-id: The test case IDresponse-file: Path to the executor's response (e.g.,response.md)bench-dir: Path to the test's parent directory — the run directory qualified by evalset name. Example:.agentv/results/<experiment>/<timestamp>/<evalset-name>/. The evalset name comes from the eval.yamlnamefield; when absent, it falls back to the eval file's basename (e.g.my-suite.eval.yaml→my-suite), matching CLI mode. The grader writes results under{bench-dir}/{test-id}/....timing-file: Path totiming.json(for execution-metrics/latency/cost assertions)
Process
Step 1: Read Inputs
- Read the eval.yaml at
eval-path. Find the test case matchingtest-id. - Read the candidate response from
response-file. - Read the assertion definitions from the test's
assertions[]array. - Read
references/eval-yaml-spec.mdfor the exact grading recipe for each assertion type. - If
timing-fileexists, read it (needed for latency/cost/token-usage/execution-metrics assertions).
Step 2: Evaluate Each Assertion
For each assertion in the test's assertions[], evaluate it natively based on its type:
Deterministic assertions — run the check directly. Write a short Bash script when multiple checks are needed:
| Type | How to evaluate |
|---|---|
contains |
Check if response includes the value substring (case-sensitive) |
contains-any |
Check if response includes ANY of the value[] substrings (case-sensitive) |
contains-all |
Check if response includes ALL of the value[] substrings (case-sensitive) |
icontains / icontains-any / icontains-all |
Same as above, case-insensitive |
equals |
response.trim() === value.trim() |
regex |
new RegExp(value).test(response) |
starts-with |
response.startsWith(value) |
ends-with |
response.endsWith(value) |
is-json |
try { JSON.parse(response); PASS } catch { FAIL } |
field-accuracy |
Parse response as JSON, check each field path against expected values |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 241 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A ccc5c88c0e06
grader is an agent published in the GitHub repository EntityProcess/agentv (15 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 2,931 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
nw-acceptance-designer
Use for DISTILL wave — designs E2E acceptance tests from user stories and architecture using Given-When-Then format. EXPANDED scope (plan v3 §3.A, 2026-05-19) — exclusive test-expertise owner; authors ATs with maximum PBT + parametrize density, runs self-completeness audit (7-category taxonomy + 15-item checklist)…
tester
Use this agent after chunk implementation to create comprehensive test suites, or when the user requests test generation. Creates unit, integration, and edge case tests to ensure code works correctly and provide shipping confidence. Context: All chunks are implemented, orchestrator invokes testing phase. user: "All…
rn-pr-qa
Device-tests a GitHub pull request on iOS simulator, Android emulator, and/or a physical device using rn-dev-agent. Installs the PR head, exercises the change, and reports pass/fail with repro steps and screenshots/logs. PARENT-SESSION-ONLY: requires MCP tools (cdp, device, rnsession) — do NOT spawn via Task tool, run…
lead-eng
Senior engineer that implements features per the architecture and writes open tests.
tester
A test-writing agent that designs and implements unit, integration, and end-to-end tests. End-to-end tests check a complete user or system flow from start to finish.
test-automator
Writes meaningful unit and integration tests. Use to add coverage for new or existing code, or to design a testing strategy for a module.