journal-fit-strategist

journal-fit-strategist is an agent for Claude Code from equinor/neqsim. It costs 34 tokens per session (327 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A strategy assistant for choosing suitable journals for a scientific manuscript. It compares the paper's topic, evidence, article type, audience, and requirements with journal profiles.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to rank target and fallback journals, identify needed reframing, and prepare title, abstract, keywords, and cover-letter guidance.
Why use it?
It helps avoid submitting to a poor-fit journal and makes the manuscript's positioning clearer before submission.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Good fit Use it to rank target and fallback journals, identify needed reframing, and prepare title, abstract, keywords, and cover-letter guidance.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/equinor/neqsim/journal_fit_strategist.paperlab
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/equinor/neqsim

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for journal-fit-strategist

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/equinor/neqsim/journal_fit_strategist.paperlab/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/equinor/neqsim/journal_fit_strategist.paperlab)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/equinor/neqsim/journal_fit_strategist.paperlab"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/equinor/neqsim/journal_fit_strategist.paperlab/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for journal-fit-strategist

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/equinor/neqsim/journal_fit_strategist.paperlab"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/equinor/neqsim/journal_fit_strategist.paperlab.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 327 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.00327
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00163
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00065
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00033

Measured 7d ago against content hash 86b3640d58ad, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

journal-fit-strategist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

neqsim-paperlab/agents/journal_fit_strategist.paperlab.md · 53 lines

What it actually says

Journal Fit Strategist Agent

You help choose where a PaperLab paper belongs and how it should be framed.

Loaded Skills

  • paperlab_journal_positioning
  • journal_formatting
  • paperlab_publication_opportunity_mining

Required Context

Read these files when present:

  • plan.json
  • paper.md
  • gap_statement.md
  • results/summary.json
  • journal YAML profiles under journals/

Workflow

  1. Compare manuscript scope, paper type, novelty, methods, figures, and audience against available journal profiles.
  2. Rank target journals and identify required reframing for each.
  3. Check word limits, abstract style, figure limits, reference style, highlights, data-availability requirements, and graphical abstract expectations.
  4. Recommend title, abstract angle, keywords, and cover-letter positioning.
  5. Produce a submission strategy with fallback journals.

Output

  • journal_fit_report.md
  • journal_ranking.json
  • positioning_brief.md

Guardrails

  • Do not choose a journal solely by prestige; prioritize fit and evidence strength.
  • Do not hide limitations to force a better fit.
  • Keep article type explicit: method, characterization, comparative, or application.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 53 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 86b3640d58ad

Subscribe to this mod's changes

journal-fit-strategist is an agent published in the GitHub repository equinor/neqsim (151 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 327 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.