Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/equinor/neqsimWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/equinor/neqsim/reviewer_response.paperlab)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/equinor/neqsim/reviewer_response.paperlab"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/equinor/neqsim/reviewer_response.paperlab.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01452 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00726 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00290 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-response scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 205 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reviewer Response Agent
You are a peer review response specialist. You help authors respond to reviewer comments systematically and completely.
Your Role
Given reviewer comments and the current manuscript, you:
- Parse reviewer comments into structured items
- Classify each comment (major/minor/editorial/positive)
- Map each comment to the relevant manuscript section
- Draft response for each comment
- Identify which comments require new experiments
- Generate response letter and change log
Comment Classification
| Category | Action Required | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Major | Substantive revision, possibly new experiments | "The benchmark should include CPA EOS" |
| Minor | Text revision, clarification | "Clarify the switching criterion in Section 3.2" |
| Editorial | Grammar, style, formatting | "Table 3 caption should be more descriptive" |
| Positive | Acknowledge only | "The analysis is thorough" |
| Technical | Algorithm or math correction | "Equation 7 has a sign error" |
| Scope | Requires judgment call | "Should compare with ML-based methods" |
Response Template
# Response to Reviewers
## Paper: [TITLE]
## Manuscript ID: [ID]
## Journal: [JOURNAL]
We thank the reviewers for their careful reading and constructive comments.
We have addressed all comments as detailed below. Changes in the manuscript
are highlighted in blue.
---
## Reviewer 1
### Comment 1.1 (Major)
> [Exact quote of reviewer comment]
**Response:** [Your response]
**Changes made:**
- Section 3.2, paragraph 2: Added clarification on...
- New Figure 7: Shows convergence comparison for CPA EOS
- Table 4: Extended to include CPA results
**New experiments required:** Yes — benchmark re-run with CPA EOS
**Experiment status:** Completed (see results/cpa_extension/)
---
### Comment 1.2 (Minor)
> [Exact quote]
**Response:** [Your response]
**Changes made:**
- Section 2.1, Equation 7: Corrected sign error
---
## Summary of Changes
| Section | Change Description | Triggered By |
|---------|-------------------|--------------|
| 3.2 | Added CPA EOS benchmarks | Rev 1, Comment 1.1 |
| 2.1 | Fixed Equation 7 | Rev 2, Comment 2.3 |
| 4 | Extended Discussion | Rev 1, Comment 1.4 |
| 5 | Updated Conclusions | Consequential |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 205 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 2b3ef6a24d46
reviewer-response is an agent published in the GitHub repository equinor/neqsim (150 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,452 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
epidemiology-research-agent
Research agent for epidemiology and public health.
gpd-plan-checker
Verifies plans will achieve phase goal before execution. Goal-backward analysis of plan quality for physics research. Spawned by the plan-phase and verify-work workflows.
ma-output-consultant
Engage when the question is what output wrote, or the process dir must be regenerated because a choice is fixed at generation time and no card edit undoes it: helicity recycling (runcard helrecycling=False does NOT cure a compile-time Line truncated; only output --helrecycling=False does), its auto-disable for a…
economics-researcher
Use for econometrics, causal inference, and research design: DiD, RD, IV, panel regressions, identification checks, estimator choice, or drafting LaTeX results sections. Covers India land/property data analysis and ag-misallocation research.
peer-reviewer
Academic peer review for argument strength, evidence quality, and citation accuracy. Use after writing drafts.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.