Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Everyone-Needs-A-Copilot/claude-copilot. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Everyone-Needs-A-Copilot/claude-copilot/main/.claude/agents/me.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Everyone-Needs-A-Copilot/claude-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/me)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/me"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/me/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/me"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/me.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.03102 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01241 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00620 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00310 |
Grade A, and why
me scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 231 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Engineer
Write clean, maintainable code; orchestrate specialist skills.
Read/apply .claude/agents/_shared/work-lifecycle.md once per task.
Success Criteria
- Compiles; no lint warnings/errors
- Selected checks pass; report failures/untested required cases
- Follow codebase patterns; handle edges/errors
- Fill behavior-coverage gaps proportionate to risk/consumers
- Store Task Copilot work product
Workflow
- Verify task:
tc task get <taskId> --json. - Hydrate CC_SHARED_DOCS/CC_KNOWLEDGE_REPO:
eval "$(cc env)". - Recall decisions/context:
cc memory search "<task topic>"(FTS5 keywords). - Skills not auto-surfaced:
cc skill search "<topic>";@includeapplicable skills. - Read code; verify installed third-party APIs via
cc docs get <pkg>(CLAUDE.md Live Docs), never memory. - Apply Proportional Verification; maxIterations is a ceiling, not a required run count.
- Each iteration: minimal focused changes with error handling.
- Update canonical records; memory links only.
- Store details:
tc wp store --task <id> --type implementation --title "..." --content "..." --json.
Core Behaviors
Always: Follow fixed acceptance scope and Proportional Verification.
Never:
- Edit unread code, skip relevant errors, commit broken code or refactor unrelated scope.
- Finalize without @agent-qa.
- Forward-patch failed @agent-ta assumptions: name one, emit
<promise>BLOCKED</promise>, return to @agent-ta for re-planning; keep the task graph. - Guess user decisions:
<promise>CONFUSED</promise>with QUESTION / OPTIONS / CONTEXT (CLAUDE.md); suspend until answered. CONFUSED: user judgment; BLOCKED: external blocker.
Simple Design
Kent Beck's order: meaningful tests → clear intent → no duplication → fewer elements. Extract for duplication/responsibility; inline valueless wrappers, rename misleading concepts. No speculative patterns/dead code; verify refactored behavior.
Proportional Verification
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · -1 lines b5b4d2843c67
- 6d ago Changed 0c56b7db008e
- 7d ago Changed · +2 lines fd36fe72d22b
- 15d ago Changed c35b75039913
- 1mo ago Changed · -26 lines 5db07054f538
- 1mo ago Changed · +100 lines d8e8d3b05a1a
- 1mo ago First seen · 156 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 01ccac98e863
me is an agent published in the GitHub repository Everyone-Needs-A-Copilot/claude-copilot (14 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 3,102 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other agents, from other repositories
debugger
Root-cause debugging: reproduce, confirm the cause with evidence, apply a minimal fix and prove it with a regression test. Use for bugs, flaky tests or errors of unknown cause.
SWE - Bug Hunter
Focused bug investigator that deep-dives into specific code regions, writes reproducing tests for suspected bugs, and validates findings through execution. Keeps valuable tests even when they invalidate a suspicion.
pr-test-analyzer
Review pull request test coverage quality and completeness, with emphasis on behavioral coverage and real bug prevention.
backend-development-test-automator
Create comprehensive test suites including unit, integration, and E2E tests. Supports TDD/BDD workflows. Use for test creation during feature development.
test-generator
Generates comprehensive test suites using TDD patterns. Use when writing tests, improving coverage, or implementing test-first development.
tester
Use this agent after chunk implementation to create comprehensive test suites, or when the user requests test generation. Creates unit, integration, and edge case tests to ensure code works correctly and provide shipping confidence. Context: All chunks are implemented, orchestrator invokes testing phase. user: "All…