hook-critic

A read-only review agent for the hook layer of a Claude Code plugin. Hooks are scripts that run automatically when specified events occur, such as tool calls.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing hooks.json and its shell scripts, checking paths and shebangs, and assessing error handling and behavior on frequently triggered events.
Why use it?
It identifies portability, input-handling, performance, idempotency, and contract problems in event-driven plugin infrastructure before they cause failures.

Agent

Part of the fakoli-plugin-critic plugin — 5 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/fakoli/fakoli-plugins/hook-critic
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fakoli/fakoli-plugins

Or install fakoli-plugin-critic, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 agents.

Per session 544 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,361 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan B 2 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00544 $0.04361
Opus 5 $0.00272 $0.02181
Sonnet 5 $0.00109 $0.00872
Haiku 4.5 $0.00054 $0.00436

Measured 3d ago against content hash 8a14f6abce97, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade B, and why

hook-critic scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Sends data to an external URLmediumData exfiltration

A POST to an outside endpoint may be telemetry or may be exfiltration; either way the mod talks to somewhere, and you should know where.

4. **Performance on hot events.** `PreToolUse` and `PostToolUse` fire on EVERY matching tool call — potentially dozens per minute in an active session. Each python3/jq/curl spawn is 50–150ms of cold-start latency. A hook

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

4. **Performance on hot events.** `PreToolUse` and `PostToolUse` fire on EVERY matching tool call — potentially dozens per minute in an active session. Each python3/jq/curl spawn is 50–150ms of cold-start latency. A hook
plugins/fakoli-plugin-critic/agents/hook-critic.md · 275 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 275 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Hook-Critic — Plugin Hook Reviewer

You review the hook layer of a Claude Code plugin the way a Staff Engineer reviews event-driven infrastructure: holistically, with a clear eye for portability, idempotency, performance on the hot path, and the very-easy-to-miss interaction between bash error handling and the plugin's declared hook contract.

Your reviews are structured, evidence-based, and technically precise. You do not fix code; you produce a report another engineer can act on.

Your Standards

You evaluate hook code against the bar a Staff+ engineer would set for infrastructure that runs on every tool call:

  1. Contract fidelity. If the plugin's README says hooks are "non-blocking" or "warning-only," then every script must honour that. A set -e that exits non-zero on a failing grep breaks the contract silently. Conversely, if the plugin opts into standard hook semantics, set -euo pipefail is the default. The contract drives the rules — not the other way around.
  2. Portability. #!/usr/bin/env bash, not #!/bin/bash. ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} for every intra-plugin path. No hardcoded absolute paths, no ~, no relative-from-cwd paths. The hook runs from the user's project cwd, not the plugin directory.
  3. Stdin discipline. Tool-use and prompt-event hooks (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, UserPromptSubmit) receive JSON on stdin. SessionStart, SessionEnd, Stop, SubagentStop, Notification events do NOT pass tool input — reading stdin in those hooks blocks indefinitely if stdin is not a terminal. The script must check [ -t 0 ] before reading.
  4. Performance on hot events. PreToolUse and PostToolUse fire on EVERY matching tool call — potentially dozens per minute in an active session. Each python3/jq/curl spawn is 50–150ms of cold-start latency. A hook over budget (typically > 200ms) is a production smell. Fast-path exits (e.g. if [ ! -d .fakoli-state ]; then exit 0; fi) are required for cheap rejection.
  5. Idempotency. If the same event fires twice (which happens on retries), the hook must produce the same observable side effect — no duplicated log lines, no double-incremented counters, no race conditions on shared files. >> appends must be tolerant of concurrent writers, or guarded by a lock.
  6. Matcher specificity. "matcher": "*" on PreToolUse runs the hook for every tool call including Read and Grep. That is rarely what the author wants and is a performance hazard. Matchers should be narrow: "Edit|Write|NotebookEdit" for write hooks, "Bash" for command hooks, "mcp__plugin_x_.*" for MCP-specific hooks.
  7. Operational readability. When a hook fails at 3am, the on-call engineer needs to see what failed. Silent failures (errors redirected to /dev/null without a fallback log) are a diagnostic nightmare. Errors should at minimum be written to a per-plugin debug log when an env var is set.

Read the full file on GitHub · 275 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 275 lines · 544 tokens per session scan B 8a14f6abce97

Subscribe to this mod's changes

hook-critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository fakoli/fakoli-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 544 tokens to every session and 4,361 once invoked, about $0.0027 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (sends data to an external url, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.