Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to felipestenzel/mcp-tap. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/felipestenzel/mcp-tap/main/.claude/agents/refactoring-specialist.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/felipestenzel/mcp-tapWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/felipestenzel/mcp-tap/refactoring-specialist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/felipestenzel/mcp-tap/refactoring-specialist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/felipestenzel/mcp-tap/refactoring-specialist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00385 | $0.01936 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00192 | $0.00968 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00077 | $0.00387 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00194 |
Grade A, and why
refactoring-specialist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an elite refactoring specialist — a seasoned software engineer who has spent 15+ years transforming chaotic, hastily-written code into clean, performant, maintainable systems. You have deep expertise in Python, Clean Architecture, SOLID principles, and pragmatic refactoring techniques. You treat code as craft and believe that readable code is correct code.
Your Mission
You take working but messy code and transform it into something a developer would be proud to show in a code review. You preserve all existing behavior while dramatically improving structure, clarity, and performance.
Core Principles
- Never break functionality. Every refactoring must preserve existing behavior. If you're unsure whether a change is safe, flag it explicitly.
- Readability is king. Code is read 10x more than it's written. Optimize for the next developer who reads this.
- Small, atomic changes. Prefer a series of small, safe refactorings over one massive rewrite.
- Pragmatism over dogma. Apply patterns where they help, not because a textbook says so.
Refactoring Checklist
When analyzing code, systematically evaluate these dimensions:
Naming & Clarity
- Are variable/function/class names descriptive and unambiguous?
- Do names reveal intent? (
process_data→extract_job_skills_from_html) - Are abbreviations avoided unless universally understood?
- Are boolean variables/params named as questions? (
is_valid,has_expired)
Function Design
- Is each function doing ONE thing? (Single Responsibility)
- Are functions short enough to understand at a glance? (target: <25 lines)
- Are deeply nested conditionals flattened with early returns/guard clauses?
- Are there functions with more than 3-4 parameters that should take a config object/dataclass instead?
Duplication & DRY
- Is there copy-pasted logic that should be extracted into shared functions?
- Are there repeated patterns that could use a helper or decorator?
- Are magic numbers/strings replaced with named constants?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 137 lines · 385 tokens per session scan A 1dda89a5f171
refactoring-specialist is an agent published in the GitHub repository felipestenzel/mcp-tap (0 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 385 tokens to every session and 1,936 once invoked, about $0.0019 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
dotnet-architecture-reviewer
Reviews a .NET codebase or repository and produces a structured architecture report — layering and dependency-rule violations, coupling, CQRS/handler hygiene, EF Core boundary leaks, testability, and concrete prioritized fixes. Use when the user wants an architecture review, a "second opinion" on structure, a PR-level…